Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28593514›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2017

Influence of Formulation Factors on the Aerosol Performance of Suspension and Solution Metered Dose Inhalers: A Systematic Approach.

Poonam Sheth, Dennis Sandell, Denise S Conti, Jay T Holt, Anthony J Hickey, Bhawana Saluja

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Poonam ShethRecipharm, 511 Davis Drive, Suite 100, Morrisville, North Carolina, 27560, USA. poonam.aliyah.sheth@recipharm.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7101-6665
Dennis SandellS5 Consulting, Ekvägen 8, Blentarp, Sweden.
Denise S ContiOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Jay T HoltCirrus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Anthony J HickeyCirrus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Bhawana SalujaOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · USAurobindo Pharma (United States) · USRecipharm (France) · FRRTI International · US

Funding

Comprehensive evaluation of formulation effects on metered dose inhaler performanU01FD004943 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BULITTA, JURGEN BERND, HOCHHAUS, GUENTHER · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
FDA HHS U01 FD004943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are complex drug-device combination products widely used to treat pulmonary disorders. The efficacy, driven by aerosol performance of the products, depends on a multitude of factors including, but not limited to, the physicochemical properties of drug and nature and amount of excipient(s). Under the quality by design (QbD) paradigm, systematic investigations are necessary to understand how changes in critical quality attributes (CQAs) of formulation, device, and manufacturing process influence key product performance parameters, such as delivered dose (DD) and fine particle dose (FPD). The purpose of this work is to provide a better understanding of the effects of different levels of excipients and drug particle size distribution on the aerosol performance of MDI products, while using two fundamentally different MDI products as relevant model systems, Proventil® HFA (albuterol sulfate suspension) and Qvar® (beclomethasone dipropionate solution). These MDI products, as model systems, provided mid-points around which a design of experiments (DOE), consisting of 22 suspension and 9 solution MDI formulations, were defined and manufactured. The DOE included formulations factors with varying ethanol (2 to 20% w/w and 7 to 9% w/w for the suspension and solution, respectively) and oleic acid concentrations (0.005 to 0.25% w/w and 0 to 2% w/w for the suspension and solution, respectively) and drug volumetric median particle size distribution (PSD D

Indexed as

Metered Dose InhalersAerosolsChemistry, PharmaceuticalParticle SizeSolutionsSuspensionsAerosolsSolutionsSuspensionsalbuterol sulfatebeclomethasone dipropionatedelivered dosedesign of experimentsdesign spacesexcipientsfine particle dosemathematical modelsmetered dose inhalers

Identifiers

PMID28593514
OpenAlexW2622971040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.