Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28593466›Full record

ReviewJournal of inherited metabolic disease2017

High-content drug screening for rare diseases.

F Bellomo, D L Medina, E De Leo, A Panarella, F Emma

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Carnitine is a pharmacological allosteric chaperone of the human lysosomalJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. High content drug screening for Fanconi anemia therapeutics.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F BellomoDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital - IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy. francesco.bellomo@opbg.net.ORCID 0000-0003-2912-8764
D L MedinaTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), Pozzuoli, NA, Italy.
E De LeoDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
A PanarellaTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), Pozzuoli, NA, Italy.
F EmmaDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITTelethon Institute Of Genetics And Medicine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per definition, rare diseases affect only a small number of subjects within a given population. Taken together however, they represent a considerable medical burden, which remains poorly addressed in terms of treatment. Compared to other diseases, obstacles to the development of therapies for rare diseases include less extensive physiopathology knowledge, limited number of patients to test treatments, and poor commercial interest from the industry. Recently, advances in high-throughput and high-content screening (HTS and HCS) have been fostered by the development of specific routines that use robot- and computer-assisted technologies to automatize tasks, allowing screening of a large number of compounds in a short period of time, using experimental model of diseases. These approaches are particularly relevant for drug repositioning in rare disease, which restricts the search to compounds that have already been tested in humans, thereby reducing the need for extensive preclinical tests. In the future, these same tools, combined with computational modeling and artificial neural network analyses, may also be used to predict individual clinical responses to drugs in a personalized medicine approach.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutomationDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug RepositioningFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMicroscopyPhenotypeQuality ControlRare DiseasesSoftwareTechnology, Pharmaceutical

Identifiers

PMID28593466
OpenAlexW2621725158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.