Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28593464›Full record

SynthesisMycorrhiza2017

Fine root endophytes under scrutiny: a review of the literature on arbuscule-producing fungi recently suggested to belong to the Mucoromycotina.

Suzanne Orchard, Rachel J Standish, Ian A Dickie, Michael Renton, Christopher Walker, Derrick Moot, Megan H Ryan

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Mycorrhiza, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mycoscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Integrated management of fruit trees andFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Suzanne OrchardUWA School of Agriculture and Environment, and Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley (Perth), WA, 6009, Australia. suzanne.orchard@research.uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-4309
Rachel J StandishSchool of Veterinary & Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Ian A DickieBio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln, 7647, New Zealand.
Michael RentonUWA School of Agriculture and Environment, and Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley (Perth), WA, 6009, Australia.
Christopher WalkerUWA School of Agriculture and Environment, and Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley (Perth), WA, 6009, Australia.
Derrick MootDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln, 7647, New Zealand.
Megan H RyanUWA School of Agriculture and Environment, and Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley (Perth), WA, 6009, Australia.
The University of Western Australia · AULincoln University · NZMurdoch University · AURoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fine root endophytes (FRE) are arbuscule-forming fungi presently considered as a single species-Glomus tenue in the Glomeromycota (Glomeromycotina)-but probably belong within the Mucoromycotina. Thus, FRE are the only known arbuscule-forming fungi not within the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; Glomeromycotina) as currently understood. Phylogenetic differences between FRE and AMF could reflect ecological differences. To synthesize current ecological knowledge, we reviewed the literature on FRE and identified 108 papers that noted the presence of FRE and, in some, the colonization levels for FRE or AMF (or both). We categorized these records by geographic region, host-plant family and environment (agriculture, moderate-natural, low-temperature, high-altitude and other) and determined their influence on the percentage of root length colonized by FRE in a meta-analysis. We found that FRE are globally distributed, with many observations from Poaceae, perhaps due to grasses being widely distributed. In agricultural environments, colonization by FRE often equalled or exceeded that of AMF, particularly in Australasia. In moderate-natural and high-altitude environments, average colonization by FRE (~10%) was lower than that of AMF (~35%), whereas in low-temperature environments, colonization was similar (~20%). Several studies suggested that FRE can enhance host-plant phosphorus uptake and growth, and may be more resilient than AMF to environmental stress in some host plants. Further research is required on the functioning of FRE in relation to the environment, host plant and co-occurring AMF and, in particular, to examine whether FRE are important for plant growth in stressful environments. Targeted molecular primers are urgently needed for further research on FRE.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologySymbiosisAgricultureEndophytesFungi, UnclassifiedGlomeromycotaMycorrhizaePhylogenyPlantsArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiFine endophyteGlomus tenueGlomus tenuisMucoromycotinaRhizophagus tenuis

Identifiers

PMID28593464
OpenAlexW2623254831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.