Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28593462›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

Moderators of the effects of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors on personal meaning, psychological well-being, and distress.

Karen Holtmaat, Nadia van der Spek, Birgit I Witte, William Breitbart, Pim Cuijpers, Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Construction of new personal meanings by cancer patients: a qualitative analysis in an Italian patient population.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen HoltmaatDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nadia van der SpekDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Birgit I WitteDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
William BreitbartDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Irma M Verdonck-de LeeuwDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. IM.Verdonck@vumc.nl.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
KWF Kankerbestrijding 4864NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is evidence to support that meaning-centered group psychotherapy for cancer survivors (MCGP-CS) is an effective intervention for improving personal meaning and psychological well-being, as well as reducing psychological distress. In order to investigate which subpopulations MCGP-CS specifically benefits, this explorative study aims to analyze potential sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors that may moderate the effects.

methodsCancer survivors (N = 114) were randomly assigned to MCGP-CS, or care as usual (CAU). Potential moderators included age, sex, relationship, education, employment, religion, cancer type, tumor stage, cancer treatment, time since treatment, anxiety, depression, other negative life events, and previous psychological treatment. Outcome measures were the Personal Meaning Profile (PMP), Scales of Psychological Well-Being (SPWB), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Assessment took place at baseline, post-intervention (short-term), and 3- and 6-month follow-ups (long-term). For each moderator, separate short-term and long-term linear mixed models were built.

resultsShort-term effect of MCGP-CS was moderated by (male) sex (on HADS-D; F(1,98) = 6.1, p = .015) and (a high level of) depressive symptoms at baseline (on SPWB; F(1,93) = 5.7, p = .019). Long-term effect of MCGP-CS was moderated by (not having received) previous psychological treatment (on HADS-total; F(3253) = 3.4, p = .017).

conclusionsMost sociodemographic and clinical characteristics do not appear to moderate the positive effect of MCGP-CS on personal meaning. However, MCGP-CS appears to reduce depressive symptoms, particularly in males, and to improve purpose in life of survivors with depressive symptoms. In the long-term, MCGP-CS appears to reduce psychological distress in survivors who had not received psychological treatment in the past year.

trial registrationNTR3571.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychotherapy, GroupCancerMeaningModeratorOncologyPsychotherapyWell-being

Identifiers

PMID28593462
PMCPMC5610658
OpenAlexW2623419288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.