Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28593461›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2017

Self-prioritization and perceptual matching: The effects of temporal construal.

Marius Golubickis, Johanna K Falben, Arash Sahraie, Aleksandar Visokomogilski, William A Cunningham, Jie Sui, C Neil Macrae

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural Compensation in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Preserves Self-Prioritization in Aging: A Computational Approach.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Self-Prioritization Reconsidered: Scrutinizing Three Claims.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  8. Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  9. The relationship between self, value-based reward, and emotion prioritisation effects.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marius GolubickisSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, Scotland. marius.golubickis.10@aberdeen.ac.uk.
Johanna K FalbenSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, Scotland.
Arash SahraieSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, Scotland.
Aleksandar VisokomogilskiSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, Scotland.
William A CunninghamDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jie SuiDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, England, UK.
C Neil MacraeSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has revealed that self-referential processing enhances perceptual judgments - the so-called self-prioritization effect. The extent and origin of this effect remains unknown, however. Noting the multifaceted nature of the self, here we hypothesized that temporal influences on self-construal (i.e., past/future-self continuity) may serve as an important determinant of stimulus prioritization. Specifically, as representations of the self increase in abstraction as a function of temporal distance (i.e., distance from now), self-prioritization may only emerge when stimuli are associated with the current self. The results of three experiments supported this prediction. Self-relevance only enhanced performance in a standard perceptual-matching task when stimuli (i.e., geometric shapes) were connected with the current self; representations of the self in the future (Expts. 1 & 2) and past (Expt. 3) failed to facilitate decision making. To identify the processes underlying task performance, data were interrogated using a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) approach. Results of these analyses revealed that self-prioritization was underpinned by a stimulus bias (i.e., rate of information uptake). Collectively, these findings elucidate when and how self-relevance influences decisional processing.

Indexed as

EgoSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceTime FactorsYoung AdultDrift diffusion modelSelfSocial cognitionTemporal construal

Identifiers

PMID28593461
PMCPMC5605582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.