Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28593450›Full record

SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2017

Clinical assessment of endothelial function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Pasquale Ambrosino, Roberta Lupoli, Salvatore Iervolino, Alberto De Felice, Nicola Pappone, Antonio Storino, Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Dietary Beetroot Juice - Effects in Patients with COPD: A Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pasquale AmbrosinoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Roberta LupoliDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Salvatore IervolinoICS Maugeri SpA SB, Scientific Institute of Telese Terme, IRCCS, Telese Terme, BN, Italy.
Alberto De FeliceICS Maugeri SpA SB, Scientific Institute of Telese Terme, IRCCS, Telese Terme, BN, Italy.
Nicola PapponeICS Maugeri SpA SB, Scientific Institute of Telese Terme, IRCCS, Telese Terme, BN, Italy.
Antonio StorinoICS Maugeri SpA SB, Scientific Institute of Telese Terme, IRCCS, Telese Terme, BN, Italy.
Matteo Nicola Dario Di MinnoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. dario.diminno@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-3819
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITFederico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have an increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Flow-mediated (FMD) and nitrate-mediated dilatation (NMD) are considered non-invasive methods to assess endothelial function and surrogate markers of subclinical atherosclerosis. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression to evaluate the impact of COPD on FMD and NMD. Studies were systematically searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE databases. The random-effect method was used to take into account the variability among included studies. A total of eight studies were included in the final analysis, eight with data on FMD (334 COPD patients) and two on NMD (104 COPD patients). Compared to controls, COPD patients show a significantly lower FMD (MD -3.15%; 95% CI -4.89, -1.40; P < 0.001) and NMD (MD -3.53%; 95% CI -7.04, -0.02; P = 0.049). Sensitivity analyses substantially confirms the results. Meta-regression models show that a more severe degree of airway obstruction is associated with a more severe FMD impairment in COPD patients than in controls. Regression analyses confirm that the association between COPD and endothelial dysfunction is independent of baseline smoking status and most traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In conclusion, COPD is significantly and independently associated with endothelial dysfunction. These findings may be useful to plan adequate cardiovascular prevention strategies in this clinical setting, with particular regard to patients with a more severe disease.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDilatationEndotheliumHumansLogistic ModelsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRisk FactorsCardiovascular riskChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseEndothelial dysfunctionFlow-mediated dilatationNitrate-mediated dilatation

Identifiers

PMID28593450
OpenAlexW2621644899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.