Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2018
Urinary symptoms after bladder flap at the time of primary cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial (RTC).
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bladder flap creation during cesarean delivery. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- The Case for Standardizing Cesarean Delivery Technique: Seeing the Forest for the Trees.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this study was to evaluate urinary symptoms in the postpartum period after omission of the bladder flap at the time of primary cesarean delivery.
methodsThis was a single-blind parallel-group randomized comparison (bladder flap, no bladder flap) in women scheduled for a primary cesarean delivery at 37 weeks gestation or later. The primary outcome was urinary symptom scores at 6-8 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of preoperative and postoperative pelvic floor symptom scores and the proportions of symptom bother responses between the study groups.
resultsA total 43 women were available for analysis. Randomization was as follows: omission of the bladder flap (n = 22) and bladder flap (n = 21). Demographic characteristics and baseline pelvic floor symptom scores were similar between the groups. The primary outcome, urinary symptom scores at 6-8 weeks postpartum, did not differ significantly between the groups, but urinary symptom bother was significantly higher in women who received a bladder flap. Pelvic floor symptom scores improved significantly following delivery.
conclusionsUrinary symptom scores as measured by the UDI-6 did not differ between women randomized to bladder flap or omission of the bladder flap, but the proportion of women with urinary symptom bother was significantly higher among those who received a bladder flap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28593365What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.