Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28593190›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Nucleus Accumbens Shell Dopamine Preferentially Tracks Information Related to Outcome Value of Reward.

Deirdre A Sackett, Michael P Saddoris, Regina M Carelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Untangling dopamine and glutamate in the ventral tegmental area.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deirdre A SackettDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.ORCID 0000-0001-8754-4665
Michael P SaddorisDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.ORCID 0000-0002-0491-880X
Regina M CarelliDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.

Funding

Training on Research in Drug AbuseT32DA007244 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Regina M Carelli · 1990 to 2026
$7.6M
Neurobiological Investigation of Decision Making in RatsR01DA034021 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CARELLI, REGINA M · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Neurobiological investigation of delay discounting: role of prelimbic cortex -> nucleus accumbens circuitF31DA042721 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SACKETT, DEIRDRE · 2016 to 2017
$65k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA042721NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034021NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective decision-making requires organisms to predict reward values and bias behavior toward the best available option. The mesolimbic dopamine system, including the nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell and core, is involved in this process. Although studies support a role of the shell and core in specific aspects of decision-making (e.g., risk, effort, delay), no studies have directly compared dopamine release dynamics in these subregions to cues exclusively signaling the availability of different reward magnitudes. Here, fast-scan cyclic voltammetry was used to compare rapid dopamine release dynamics in the NAc subregions during a magnitude-based decision-making task. Rats learned that distinct cues signaled the availability of either a small or large reward (one or two sugar pellets), and then were given an opportunity to choose their preferred option. We found that peak dopamine release tracked the more preferred (higher-magnitude) option in both core and shell subregions. Critically, however, overall (i.e., global) dopamine release was significantly higher and longer lasting in the shell and tracked the preferred magnitude during the entire cue period. Further, in the shell (not core), dopamine signaling significantly declined immediately at the lever press for reward but increased during the period of reward consumption. Collectively, the results indicate that although dopamine release in both the core and shell are activated by cues signaling the opportunity to respond for rewards of different magnitudes, dopamine release in the shell plays a differential and unique role in tracking information related to the outcome value of reward.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsConditioning, OperantCuesDecision MakingDiscrimination, PsychologicalDopamineElectrochemical TechniquesFood DeprivationMaleNucleus AccumbensRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyDopamineAccumbensbehaviordecision makingdopamineelectrochemistryreward

Identifiers

PMID28593190
PMCPMC5461554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.