Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28592988›Full record

ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2017

Algorithms for computing the double cut and join distance on both gene order and intergenic sizes.

Guillaume Fertin, Géraldine Jean, Eric Tannier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Super short operations on both gene order and intergenic sizes.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2019
    Article
  4. Sorting signed circular permutations by super short operations.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume Fertin *LS2N UMR CNRS 6004, Université de Nantes, 2 rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France.
Géraldine Jean *LS2N UMR CNRS 6004, Université de Nantes, 2 rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France.
Eric Tannier *Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria) Grenoble Rhône-Alpes, 655 avenue de l'Europe, 38330 Montbonnot-Saint-Martin, France.
Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive · FRLaboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes · FRNantes Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombinatorial works on genome rearrangements have so far ignored the influence of intergene sizes, i.e. the number of nucleotides between consecutive genes, although it was recently shown decisive for the accuracy of inference methods (Biller et al. in Genome Biol Evol 8:1427-39, 2016; Biller et al. in Beckmann A, Bienvenu L, Jonoska N, editors. Proceedings of Pursuit of the Universal-12th conference on computability in Europe, CiE 2016, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9709, Paris, France, June 27-July 1, 2016. Berlin: Springer, p. 35-44, 2016). In this line, we define a new genome rearrangement model called wDCJ, a generalization of the well-known double cut and join (or DCJ) operation that modifies both the gene order and the intergene size distribution of a genome.

resultsWe first provide a generic formula for the wDCJ distance between two genomes, and show that computing this distance is strongly NP-complete. We then propose an approximation algorithm of ratio 4/3, and two exact ones: a fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm and an integer linear programming (ILP) formulation.

conclusionsWe provide theoretical and empirical bounds on the expected growth of the parameter at the center of our FPT and ILP algorithms, assuming a probabilistic model of evolution under wDCJ, which shows that both these algorithms should run reasonably fast in practice.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDCJGenome rearrangementsIntergenic regions

Identifiers

PMID28592988
PMCPMC5460591
OpenAlexW2622515803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.