Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28592925›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2017

Second generation multiple reaction monitoring assays for enhanced detection of ultra-low abundance

Carolina Mehaffy, Karen M Dobos, Payam Nahid, Nicole A Kruh-Garcia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Significance of extracellular vesicles in orchestration of immune responses inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Extracellular Vesicles in Mycobacteria and Tuberculosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina MehaffyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, 1682 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA.
Karen M DobosDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, 1682 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA.
Payam NahidDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA.
Nicole A Kruh-GarciaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, 1682 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA.
Colorado State University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

TB Surrogate Markers for Assessing Reponse to Treatment (TB SMART Study)R01AI104589 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NAHID, PAYAM, SIGAL, GEORGE B · 2013 to 2017
$6.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI104589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsMultiple reaction monitoring assays were optimized for the enhanced detection of 41

resultsOur enhanced methods provide limit of detection and quantification averaging in the low femtomolar range for detection of mycobacterial products in serum. At least one mycobacterial peptide was identified in 92.5% of the TB positive patients. Four peptides from the

conclusionsAn enhanced MRM method to detect ultra-low abundance

Indexed as

BiomarkerExosomesMass SpectrometryMRM (Multiple Reaction Monitoring)Mycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID28592925
PMCPMC5460347
OpenAlexW2623643132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.