Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28592663›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017

Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Diana D Chin, Laura Y Matloff, Amanda Kay Stowers, Emily R Tucci, David Lentink

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
110.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana D ChinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3015-7645
Laura Y MatloffDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2033-2243
Amanda Kay StowersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA astowers@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-9524
Emily R TucciDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-8762
David LentinkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4717-6815
Google (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harnessing flight strategies refined by millions of years of evolution can help expedite the design of more efficient, manoeuvrable and robust flying robots. This review synthesizes recent advances and highlights remaining gaps in our understanding of how bird and bat wing adaptations enable effective flight. Included in this discussion is an evaluation of how current robotic analogues measure up to their biological sources of inspiration. Studies of vertebrate wings have revealed skeletal systems well suited for enduring the loads required during flight, but the mechanisms that drive coordinated motions between bones and connected integuments remain ill-described. Similarly, vertebrate flight muscles have adapted to sustain increased wing loading, but a lack of

Indexed as

AnimalsBirdsChiropteraFlight, AnimalForelimbWings, Animalflightforelimb specializationwing design

Identifiers

PMID28592663
PMCPMC5493806
OpenAlexW2622111754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.