Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28592495›Full record

ArticleGenetics2017

Genomes of the Mouse Collaborative Cross.

Anuj Srivastava, Andrew P Morgan, Maya L Najarian, Vishal Kumar Sarsani, J Sebastian Sigmon, John R Shorter, Anwica Kashfeen, Rachel C McMullan, Lucy H Williams, Paola Giusti-Rodríguez and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
22.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mouse phenome database: curated data repository with interactive multi-population and multi-trait analyses.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A New Mouse Model for Ozone Health Effects Research.Environmental health perspectives · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing facilitates accurate and cost-effective haplotype reconstruction in complex mouse crosses.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anuj SrivastavaThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609.
Andrew P MorganDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.ORCID 0000-0003-1942-4543
Maya L NajarianDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Vishal Kumar SarsaniThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609.
J Sebastian SigmonDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
John R ShorterDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.ORCID 0000-0003-4732-5526
Anwica KashfeenDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Rachel C McMullanDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Lucy H WilliamsDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Paola Giusti-RodríguezDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Martin T FerrisDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-6268
Patrick SullivanDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Pablo HockDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Darla R MillerDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.ORCID 0000-0002-0781-7254
Timothy A BellDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Leonard McMillanDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Gary A ChurchillThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609 fernando@med.unc.edu gary.churchill@jax.org.
Fernando Pardo-Manuel de VillenaDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 fernando@med.unc.edu gary.churchill@jax.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5738-5795
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterJackson Laboratory · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Unlocking Zika Virus Immune Control and Pathogenesis with the Collaborative CrossU19AI100625 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MCWEENEY, SHANNON K. · 2012 to 2021
$36.6M
Resource Section - Core 001U42OD010924 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TERRY R MAGNUSON · 2012 to 2026
$24.5M
Systems Genetic Analysis of Multi-parent CrossesR01GM070683 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BROMAN, KARL W, CHURCHILL, GARY A · 2004 to 2022
$6.8M
An Interdisciplinary program for systems genomics of complex behaviorsP50MH090338 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, FERNANDO · 2009 to 2010
$6.0M
Systems Genetics Resource ConsortiumU01CA134240 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI THREADGILL, DAVID W. · 2007 to 2011
$5.4M
An Interdisciplinary program for systems genomics of complex behaviorsP50HG006582 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, FERNANDO · 2011 to 2013
$2.6M
Collaborative Cross: A system genetics approach to the study of male infertilityR01HD065024 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI O'BRIEN, DEBORAH A., PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, FERNANDO · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Effects of advanced paternal age on germline genome stabilityF30MH103925 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, ANDREW PARKER · 2014 to 2017
$151k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS U01 CA134240NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG006582NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI100625NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065024NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070683NIH HHS U42 OD010924NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH103925NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH090338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Collaborative Cross (CC) is a multiparent panel of recombinant inbred (RI) mouse strains derived from eight founder laboratory strains. RI panels are popular because of their long-term genetic stability, which enhances reproducibility and integration of data collected across time and conditions. Characterization of their genomes can be a community effort, reducing the burden on individual users. Here we present the genomes of the CC strains using two complementary approaches as a resource to improve power and interpretation of genetic experiments. Our study also provides a cautionary tale regarding the limitations imposed by such basic biological processes as mutation and selection. A distinct advantage of inbred panels is that genotyping only needs to be performed on the panel, not on each individual mouse. The initial CC genome data were haplotype reconstructions based on dense genotyping of the most recent common ancestors (MRCAs) of each strain followed by imputation from the genome sequence of the corresponding founder inbred strain. The MRCA resource captured segregating regions in strains that were not fully inbred, but it had limited resolution in the transition regions between founder haplotypes, and there was uncertainty about founder assignment in regions of limited diversity. Here we report the whole genome sequence of 69 CC strains generated by paired-end short reads at 30× coverage of a single male per strain. Sequencing leads to a substantial improvement in the fine structure and completeness of the genomes of the CC. Both MRCAs and sequenced samples show a significant reduction in the genome-wide haplotype frequencies from two wild-derived strains, CAST/EiJ and PWK/PhJ. In addition, analysis of the evolution of the patterns of heterozygosity indicates that selection against three wild-derived founder strains played a significant role in shaping the genomes of the CC. The sequencing resource provides the first description of tens of thousands of new genetic variants introduced by mutation and drift in the CC genomes. We estimate that new SNP mutations are accumulating in each CC strain at a rate of 2.4 ± 0.4 per gigabase per generation. The fixation of new mutations by genetic drift has introduced thousands of new variants into the CC strains. The majority of these mutations are novel compared to currently sequenced laboratory stocks and wild mice, and some are predicted to alter gene function. Approximately one-third of the CC inbred strains have acquired large deletions (>10 kb) many of which overlap known coding genes and functional elements. The sequence of these mice is a critical resource to CC users, increases threefold the number of mouse inbred strain genomes available publicly, and provides insight into the effect of mutation and drift on common resources.

Indexed as

Genetic DriftAnimalsChromosome MappingCrosses, GeneticGenomeGenotypeHaplotypesMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait Locidriftgenetic variantsMPPmultiparental populationsselectionwhole genome sequence

Identifiers

PMID28592495
PMCPMC5499171
OpenAlexW2624657184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.