ArticleBMC cancer2017
Is detection of intraperitoneal exfoliated tumor cells after surgical resection of rectal cancer a prognostic factor of survival?
Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of Probiotic-Based Multi-Components to Human, Animal and Ecosystem Health: Concepts, Methodologies, and Action Mechanisms.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Somatic Mitochondrial DNA Point Mutations Used as Biomarkers to Demonstrate Genomic Heterogeneity in Primary Prostate Cancer.Prostate cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic significance of free cancer cells detected in peritoneal fluid at the time of rectal surgery remains unclear. A substantial number of patients will develop metastatic disease even with successful local treatment. This prospective non-randomized study investigated the prognostic value of intraperitoneal free cancer cells harvested in peritoneal lavage after surgery for rectal cancer. Mutational hotspots in mitochondrial DNA were examined as potential molecular signatures to detect circulating intraperitoneal free cancer cells when present in primary tumor and in lavage.
methodsPoint mutations in mitochondrial DNA amplifications were determined in primary tumors and corresponding exfoliated intraperitoneal free cancer cells in lavage from 191 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer scheduled for radical treatment. Mitochondrial DNA target sequences were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and base substitutions were detected by denaturant, cycling temperature capillary electrophoresis. Detection of intraperitoneal free cancer cells was correlated to survival.
resultsOf 191patients analyzed, 138 (72%) were identified with somatic mitochondrial point mutations in rectal cancer tumors. From this fraction, 45 patients (33%) had positive lavage fluid with corresponding somatic mtDNA point mutations in lavage representing circulating intraperitoneal free cancer cells. There was no significant survival difference between patients identified with or without somatic mitochondrial DNA point mutations in the corresponding lavage.
conclusionSomatic mitochondrial DNA point mutations identified in primary rectal tumors enable detection of circulating intraperitoneal free cancer cells in lavage fluid. Intraperitoneal free cancer cells harvested from lavage immediately after surgery for rectal cancer does not represent an independent prognostic factor on survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.