Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28592222›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2017

The feline blood film.

John W Harvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Blood Morphology and Hematology of Adult Baikal Seals (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Insight into Recent Advances on Platelet Function in Health and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. The GRKs Reactome: Role in Cell Biology and Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John W HarveyCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practical relevance: Many veterinary practices have invested in quality automated hematology instruments for use in-house. However, regardless of their specific choice of analyzer, there are important hematology findings that can only be determined by microscopic examination of stained blood films. For this reason, and also for the purpose of quality control for the analyzer, a quick blood film review should be performed alongside every automated complete blood count. Even those practices that submit their blood samples to outside diagnostic laboratories for evaluation, still require the capability to examine stained blood films in emergency situations. Series outline: This is the second of a two-part article series that aims to familiarize the practitioner with normal findings on feline blood films, with a particular focus on unique features in the cat, as well as to assist with interpretation of common abnormalities. Part 2 focuses on the morphology of feline leukocytes and platelets in health and disease. Evidence base: The information and guidance offered is based on the published literature and the author's own extensive clinical pathology research.

Indexed as

AnimalsCat DiseasesCatsHematologic TestsMicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID28592222
PMCPMC11129198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.