Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28591727›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

VEGF-C expression attributes the risk for lymphatic metastases to ovarian cancer patients.

Sascha Kuerti, Leticia Oliveira-Ferrer, Karin Milde-Langosch, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Karen Legler, Linn Woelber, Katharina Prieske, Sven Mahner, Fabian Trillsch

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Lymphatic Function and Dysfunction in the Context of Sex Differences.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sascha KuertiDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Leticia Oliveira-FerrerDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Karin Milde-LangoschDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Barbara SchmalfeldtDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Karen LeglerDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Linn WoelberDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Katharina PrieskeDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Munich, Munich 81377, Germany.
Fabian TrillschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Munich, Munich 81377, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal dissemination and retroperitoneal lymph node involvement are main routes for progression of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mediated angiogenesis has been identified as an important mechanism promoting tumour progression.

methodsTumour tissue of 100 patients with EOC was analysed for protein expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, -C, -D by Western Blot analysis. Expression patterns in patients with 'extensive intraperitoneal' metastases (pT3c pN1 and pT3b-pT3c pN0, n=80) were compared to patients with 'predominantly retroperitoneal' metastases (pT1a-pT3b, pN1, n=20). Overall and progression-free survival was analysed by Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsWhile no significant differences in expression levels among the different modes of metastases were noted for VEGF-A and -D, VEGF-C expression was significantly higher in the group of predominantly retroperitoneal metastases compared to the group with extensive intraperitoneal metastases. Patients with high VEGF-C expression had a significantly worse overall survival compared to patients with low expression levels.

conclusionsRetroperitoneal tumour progression in EOC patients is associated with high VEGF-C expression. VEGF-C may serve as a molecular marker to identify patients with assumed high risk for lymphatic metastases, who might benefit from specific treatment strategies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlotting, WesternDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsRisk FactorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor CVascular Endothelial Growth Factor CVEGFC protein, humanlymph node metastasesmesenchymal phenotypeovarian cancertumour dissemination(VEGF)-A, -C, -D

Identifiers

PMID28591727
PMCPMC5522140
OpenAlexW2615726315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.