Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28591630›Full record

ReviewCell metabolism2017

A Guide for the Design of Pre-clinical Studies on Sex Differences in Metabolism.

Franck Mauvais-Jarvis, Arthur P Arnold, Karen Reue

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell metabolism, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 269 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Untargeted metabolomics reveals effects of calorie restriction on skeletal muscle in older female and male rats.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Special Issue "Hormone Signaling in Human Health and Diseases".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Loss of ovarian function and estrogen therapy remodel the brain's synaptic and metabolic proteome.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2026
    Article
  12. CD4Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Franck Mauvais-JarvisDiabetes Discovery & Gender Medicine Laboratory, Section of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA. Electronic address: fmauvais@tulane.edu.
Arthur P ArnoldDepartment of Integrative Biology & Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Karen ReueDepartment of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USTulane University · US

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK041301 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ROZENGURT, JUAN ENRIQUE · 1990 to 2019
$18.0M
Targeting the estrogen receptor-α to protect functional β-cell mass in womenR01DK074970 · NIDDK · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI Franck Mauvais-Jarvis · 2007 to 2026
$6.0M
Genetic Mechanisms in Klinefelter Syndrome-Related BehaviorsR01HD076125 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARNOLD, ARTHUR P, JENTSCH, J. DAVID · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Sex differences in obesity and metabolic diseaseR01DK083561 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARNOLD, ARTHUR P, CHEN, XUQI · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Repurposing estrogens to improve pancreatic islet transplantationR01DK107444 · NIDDK · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI MAUVAIS-JARVIS, FRANCK · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
X chromosome dosage and metabolic diseaseR56DK083561 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARNOLD, ARTHUR P, REUE, KAREN · 2016 to 2016
$154k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076125NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK041301NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK074970NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083561NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK107444NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK083561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In animal models, the physiological systems involved in metabolic homeostasis exhibit a sex difference. Investigators often use male rodents because they show metabolic disease better than females. Thus, females are not used precisely because of an acknowledged sex difference that represents an opportunity to understand novel factors reducing metabolic disease more in one sex than the other. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) mandate to consider sex as a biological variable in preclinical research places new demands on investigators and peer reviewers who often lack expertise in model systems and experimental paradigms used in the study of sex differences. This Perspective discusses experimental design and interpretation in studies addressing the mechanisms of sex differences in metabolic homeostasis and disease, using animal models and cells. We also highlight current limitations in research tools and attitudes that threaten to delay progress in studies of sex differences in basic animal research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchMetabolismSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID28591630
PMCPMC5516948
OpenAlexW2624541569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.