ArticleBiophysical journal2017
Analysis of Noise Mechanisms in Cell-Size Control.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Coupling Bacterial Cell Size Regulation with Clonal Proliferation Dynamics Reveals Cell Division Based on Surface Area.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A generalized adder for cell size homeostasis: Effects on stochastic clonal proliferation.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- A GeneralizedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of cell size regulation in slow-growing Escherichia coli cells: discriminating models beyond the adder.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- A Moments-Based Analytical Approach for Cell Size Homeostasis.IEEE control systems letters · 2024Article
- PyEcoLib: a python library for simulating stochastic cell size dynamics.Physical biology · 2023Article
- The effect of natural selection on the propagation of protein expression noise to bacterial growth.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Microbial metabolic noise.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2021Review
- Article
- Modeling homeostasis mechanisms that set the target cell size.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- On the Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Animal Cell Size Homeostasis.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2020Review
- PDE MODELS OF ADDER MECHANISMS IN CELLULAR PROLIFERATION.SIAM journal on applied mathematics · 2020Article
- Efficient computation of stochastic cell-size transient dynamics.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Microfluidic time-lapse analysis and reevaluation of the Bacillus subtilis cell cycle.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Controlling organism size by regulating constituent cell numbers.Proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Decision & Control. IEEE Conference on Decision & Control · 2018Article
- Cell size control driven by the circadian clock and environment in cyanobacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Cell size control and gene expression homeostasis in single-cells.Current opinion in systems biology · 2018Article
- Division rate, cell size and proteome allocation: impact on gene expression noise and implications for the dynamics of genetic circuits.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At the single-cell level, noise arises from multiple sources, such as inherent stochasticity of biomolecular processes, random partitioning of resources at division, and fluctuations in cellular growth rates. How these diverse noise mechanisms combine to drive variations in cell size within an isoclonal population is not well understood. Here, we investigate the contributions of different noise sources in well-known paradigms of cell-size control, such as adder (division occurs after adding a fixed size from birth), sizer (division occurs after reaching a size threshold), and timer (division occurs after a fixed time from birth). Analysis reveals that variation in cell size is most sensitive to errors in partitioning of volume among daughter cells, and not surprisingly, this process is well regulated among microbes. Moreover, depending on the dominant noise mechanism, different size-control strategies (or a combination of them) provide efficient buffering of size variations. We further explore mixer models of size control, where a timer phase precedes/follows an adder, as has been proposed in Caulobacter crescentus. Although mixing a timer and an adder can sometimes attenuate size variations, it invariably leads to higher-order moments growing unboundedly over time. This results in a power-law distribution for the cell size, with an exponent that depends inversely on the noise in the timer phase. Consistent with theory, we find evidence of power-law statistics in the tail of C. crescentus cell-size distribution, although there is a discrepancy between the observed power-law exponent and that predicted from the noise parameters. The discrepancy, however, is removed after data reveal that the size added by individual newborns in the adder phase itself exhibits power-law statistics. Taken together, this study provides key insights into the role of noise mechanisms in size homeostasis, and suggests an inextricable link between timer-based models of size control and heavy-tailed cell-size distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.