Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28591613›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Analysis of Noise Mechanisms in Cell-Size Control.

Saurabh Modi, Cesar Augusto Vargas-Garcia, Khem Raj Ghusinga, Abhyudai Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A GeneralizedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microbial metabolic noise.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. PDE MODELS OF ADDER MECHANISMS IN CELLULAR PROLIFERATION.SIAM journal on applied mathematics · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Controlling organism size by regulating constituent cell numbers.Proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Decision & Control. IEEE Conference on Decision & Control · 2018
    Article
  18. Cell size control driven by the circadian clock and environment in cyanobacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saurabh ModiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Cesar Augusto Vargas-GarciaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Khem Raj GhusingaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Abhyudai SinghDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware; Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware. Electronic address: absingh@udel.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the single-cell level, noise arises from multiple sources, such as inherent stochasticity of biomolecular processes, random partitioning of resources at division, and fluctuations in cellular growth rates. How these diverse noise mechanisms combine to drive variations in cell size within an isoclonal population is not well understood. Here, we investigate the contributions of different noise sources in well-known paradigms of cell-size control, such as adder (division occurs after adding a fixed size from birth), sizer (division occurs after reaching a size threshold), and timer (division occurs after a fixed time from birth). Analysis reveals that variation in cell size is most sensitive to errors in partitioning of volume among daughter cells, and not surprisingly, this process is well regulated among microbes. Moreover, depending on the dominant noise mechanism, different size-control strategies (or a combination of them) provide efficient buffering of size variations. We further explore mixer models of size control, where a timer phase precedes/follows an adder, as has been proposed in Caulobacter crescentus. Although mixing a timer and an adder can sometimes attenuate size variations, it invariably leads to higher-order moments growing unboundedly over time. This results in a power-law distribution for the cell size, with an exponent that depends inversely on the noise in the timer phase. Consistent with theory, we find evidence of power-law statistics in the tail of C. crescentus cell-size distribution, although there is a discrepancy between the observed power-law exponent and that predicted from the noise parameters. The discrepancy, however, is removed after data reveal that the size added by individual newborns in the adder phase itself exhibits power-law statistics. Taken together, this study provides key insights into the role of noise mechanisms in size homeostasis, and suggests an inextricable link between timer-based models of size control and heavy-tailed cell-size distributions.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCaulobacter crescentusEscherichia coliHomeostasisStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID28591613
PMCPMC5474862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.