ArticleBiophysical journal2017
Configurational Preference of the Glutamate Receptor Ligand Binding Domain Dimers.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Investigation of BMAA and Its Carbamate Adducts as Potential GluR2 Modulators.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels.Pharmacological reviews · 2021Review
- Activation and desensitization of ionotropic glutamate receptors by selectively triggering pre-existing motions.Neuroscience letters · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ionotropic glutamate receptors are a family of tetrameric ion channels with functional states consisting of nonconducting, conducting, and desensitized states that are starting to become well characterized by electrophysiological and biophysical studies. However, the structure and relative energetics of these states beyond the general structure of the receptor are still not well understood. It is known that the interface between monomeric subunits of the tetramer plays a major role in distinguishing these functional states. We have used umbrella sampling and multimicrosecond molecular dynamics simulations of the GluA2 AMPA subtype glutamate receptor ligand-binding domain (LBD) dimers to characterize a natural propensity of the LBD dimers for various configurational states. Our results show a proposed desensitized conformation of the LBD dimer is a highly preferable conformation of the LBD dimer without the influence of other receptor domains or crystallographic conditions. This has been demonstrated by both free protein simulations of 5 μs duration, as well as by computed free energy difference between the active and desensitized states. At the same time, the simulations performed using the same protocols revealed that for the LBD mutant L483Y, known to lack desensitization, the postulated active state of the LBD dimer is indeed the preferred configurational state, which remained stable in the simulations. Our findings pave the path for developing more detailed hypotheses of the full receptor activation mechanism. Combined with the energetics of glutamate binding to the LBD and the energy required to open the transmembrane pore helices, our results strongly support a hypothesis that the low absolute free-energy state is the desensitized state of the intact AMPA receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.