Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28591602›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Configurational Preference of the Glutamate Receptor Ligand Binding Domain Dimers.

Michael Yonkunas, Maiti Buddhadev, Jose C Flores Canales, Maria G Kurnikova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael YonkunasChemistry Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Maiti BuddhadevChemistry Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jose C Flores CanalesChemistry Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Maria G KurnikovaChemistry Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: kurnikova@cmu.edu.

Funding

YEAST ER MOLECULAR CHAPERONE TRANSLOCATION: GENOME DATABANK HOMOLOGSP41RR006009 · NCRR · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI ROPELEWSKI, ALEXANDER J · 1990 to 2011
$22.0M
Innovative Supercomputing for Breakthrough Molecular DynamicsRC2GM093307 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI DITTRICH, MARKUS · 2009 to 2010
$2.7M
Approaches to Modeling Key Elements in Glutamate Receptors Activation MechanismR21NS074267 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KURNIKOVA, MARIA G · 2011 to 2012
$415k
NIGMS NIH HHS RC2 GM093307NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS074267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionotropic glutamate receptors are a family of tetrameric ion channels with functional states consisting of nonconducting, conducting, and desensitized states that are starting to become well characterized by electrophysiological and biophysical studies. However, the structure and relative energetics of these states beyond the general structure of the receptor are still not well understood. It is known that the interface between monomeric subunits of the tetramer plays a major role in distinguishing these functional states. We have used umbrella sampling and multimicrosecond molecular dynamics simulations of the GluA2 AMPA subtype glutamate receptor ligand-binding domain (LBD) dimers to characterize a natural propensity of the LBD dimers for various configurational states. Our results show a proposed desensitized conformation of the LBD dimer is a highly preferable conformation of the LBD dimer without the influence of other receptor domains or crystallographic conditions. This has been demonstrated by both free protein simulations of 5 μs duration, as well as by computed free energy difference between the active and desensitized states. At the same time, the simulations performed using the same protocols revealed that for the LBD mutant L483Y, known to lack desensitization, the postulated active state of the LBD dimer is indeed the preferred configurational state, which remained stable in the simulations. Our findings pave the path for developing more detailed hypotheses of the full receptor activation mechanism. Combined with the energetics of glutamate binding to the LBD and the energy required to open the transmembrane pore helices, our results strongly support a hypothesis that the low absolute free-energy state is the desensitized state of the intact AMPA receptor.

Indexed as

Glutamic AcidMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationProtein BindingProtein DomainsProtein MultimerizationProtein StabilityReceptors, AMPASolutionsWaterglutamate receptor ionotropic, AMPA 2Glutamic AcidReceptors, AMPASolutionsWater

Identifiers

PMID28591602
PMCPMC5474840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.