Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28591345›Full record

SynthesisClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2017

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of amfepramone and mazindol as a monotherapy for the treatment of obese or overweight patients.

Rosa Camila Lucchetta, Bruno Salgado Riveros, Roberto Pontarolo, Rosana Bento Radominski, Michel Fleith Otuki, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Cassyano Januário Correr

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Anti-obesity drug discovery: advances and challenges.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosa Camila LucchettaLaboratório de Serviços Clínicos e Evidências em Saúde, Departamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, BR.
Bruno Salgado RiverosLaboratório de Serviços Clínicos e Evidências em Saúde, Departamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, BR.
Roberto PontaroloLaboratório de Serviços Clínicos e Evidências em Saúde, Departamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, BR.
Rosana Bento RadominskiServiço de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo, Hospital de Clínicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, BR.
Michel Fleith OtukiDepartamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR, BR.
Fernando Fernandez-LlimosResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cassyano Januário CorrerLaboratório de Serviços Clínicos e Evidências em Saúde, Departamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, BR.
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BRUniversity of Lisbon · PTHospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of amfepramone, fenproporex and mazindol as a monotherapy for the treatment of obese or overweight patients. A systematic review of primary studies was conducted, followed by a direct meta-analysis (random effect) and mixed treatment comparison. Medline and other databases were searched. Heterogeneity was explored through I2 associated with a p-value. Of 739 identified publications, 25 were included in the meta-analysis. The global evaluation of Cochrane resulted in 19 studies with a high level of bias and six with unclear risk. Due to the lack of information in primary studies, direct meta-analyses were conducted only for amfepramone and mazindol. Compared to placebo, amfepramone resulted in higher weight loss in the short-term (<180 days; mean difference (MD) -1.281 kg; p<0.05; I2: 0.0%; p=0.379) and long-term (≥180 days; MD -6.518 kg; p<0.05; I2: 0.0%; p=0.719). Only studies with long-term follow up reported efficacy in terms of abdominal circumference and 5-10% weight reduction. These results corroborated the finding that the efficacy of amfepramone is greater than that of placebo. Treatment with mazindol showed greater short-term weight loss than that with placebo (MD -1.721 kg; p<0.05; I2: 0.9%; p=0.388). However, metabolic outcomes were poorly described, preventing a meta-analysis. A mixed treatment comparison corroborated the direct meta-analysis. Considering the high level of risk of bias and the absence of important published outcomes for anti-obesity therapy assessments, this study found that the evaluated drugs showed poor evidence of efficacy in the treatment of overweight and obese patients. Robust safety data were not identified to suggest changes in their regulatory status.

Indexed as

Appetite DepressantsDiethylpropionHumansMazindolObesityOverweightPublication BiasReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeWeight LossAppetite DepressantsDiethylpropionMazindol

Identifiers

PMID28591345
PMCPMC5439101
OpenAlexW2620959152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.