Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28591207›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Long-term growth comparison studies of FBS and FBS alternatives in six head and neck cell lines.

Chih-Yeu Fang, Chung-Chun Wu, Chia-Lang Fang, Wei-Yu Chen, Chi-Long Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Host-mimicking conditions promoteFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Ultrastructural Visualization of the Nuclear Envelope in HeLa Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Macrophage variants in laboratory research: most are well done, but some are RAW.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chih-Yeu FangDepartment of Pathology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8280-3012
Chung-Chun WuNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
Chia-Lang FangDepartment of Pathology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Yu ChenDepartment of Pathology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Long ChenDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal bovine serum (FBS) is depended upon by investigators as an indispensable supplement in cell and tissue culture systems. Due to increased demand and limited availability, the price of FBS has increased by greater than 300% in the past few years. In addition, there are ethical and scientific controversies about the collection and use of FBS in culture systems. In response to the shortage of FBS, many FBS alternative serum products have been developed. Although many have claimed comparable performance to FBS, their support of long-term cell growth and effects on cell phenotype have not been revealed. In this study, we examined the performances of six bovine calf serum-based FBS alternatives in six head and neck cell lines and compared them with FBS. The results indicate that some of these sera had growth promoting capabilities comparable or superior to that of FBS. Additionally, these alternative sera supported long-term (30 passages) growth of tested cells and exhibited plating efficiencies comparable to that of FBS. Cells cultured in alternative sera also exhibited comparable anchorage-independent growth and similar drug inhibition responses in FBS. Still, caution should be taken in choosing suitable sera given that changes in cell morphology and variations in chemotactic responses were noted for cells maintained in certain sera. These FBS alternatives are more readily available, cost less, and are associated with less ethical concerns, thus making them attractive alternatives to FBS in cell culture systems.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCulture MediaCulture Media, Serum-FreeHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansCulture MediaCulture Media, Serum-Free

Identifiers

PMID28591207
PMCPMC5462426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.