SynthesisPloS one2017
Cardiac glycosides use and the risk and mortality of cancer; systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Risk factors for prostate cancer: An umbrella review of prospective observational studies and mendelian randomization analyses.PLoS medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Digitoxin-induced apoptosis in ovarian granulosa cells disrupts follicular development and impairs reproductive performance.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Disease Meets Cancer: Exploring the Epidemiology in China and Homotherapy Targeting Intersectional Mechanisms.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Sex differences in atrial fibrillation in India: Insights from the Kerala-AF registry.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Na,K-ATPase mediated and cardiotonic induced signaling in health and disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Epidemiology, risk factors and mechanism of breast cancer and atrial fibrillation.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Digoxin and its NaBioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Integration of CRISPR/Cas9 with multi-omics technologies to engineer secondary metabolite productions in medicinal plant: Challenges and Prospects.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Review
- Intron Retention of DDX39A Driven by SNRPD2 is a Crucial Splicing Axis for Oncogenic MYC/Spliceosome Program in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Coexisting atrial fibrillation and cancer: time trends and associations with mortality in a nationwide Dutch study.European heart journal · 2024Article
- Heart failure pharmacotherapy and cancer: pathways and pre-clinical/clinical evidence.European heart journal · 2024Review
- Atrial fibrillation: better symptom control with rate and rhythm management.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Review
- Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study of atrial fibrillation and breast cancer.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Sex Differences in Atrial Fibrillation.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in atrial fibrillation management: rate and rhythm control.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023Review
- An integrative review of nonobvious puzzles of cellular and molecular cardiooncology.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2023Review
- Review
- Unlocking therapeutic potential: integration of drug repurposing and immunotherapy for various disease targeting.American journal of translational research · 2023Review
- Ouabain-Induced Changes in the Expression of Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels in Epithelial Cells Depend on Cell-Cell Contacts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac glycosides (CGs) including digitalis, digoxin and digitoxin are used in the treatment of congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Pre-clinical studies have investigated the anti-neoplastic properties of CGs since 1960s. Epidemiological studies concerning the association between CGs use and cancer risk yielded inconsistent results. We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effects of CGs on cancer risk and mortality.
methodsPubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, Medline and Web of Knowledge were searched for identifying relevant studies. Summary relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects model.
resultsWe included 14 case-control studies and 15 cohort studies published between 1976 and 2016 including 13 cancer types. Twenty-four studies reported the association between CGs and cancer risk and six reported the association between CGs and mortality of cancer patients. Using CGs was associated with a higher risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.330, 95% CI: 1.247-1.419). Subgroup analysis showed that using CGs increased the risk of ER+ve breast cancer but not ER-ve. Using CGs wasn't associated with prostate cancer risk (RR = 1.015, 95% CI: 0.868-1.87). However, CGs decreased the risk in long term users and showed a protective role in decreasing the risk of advanced stages. CGs use was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.248-1.46) but not cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.075, 95% CI: 0.968-1.194).
conclusionThe anti-tumor activity of CGs observed in pre-clinical studies requires high concentrations which can't be normally tolerated in humans. However, the estrogen-like activity of CGs could be responsible for increasing the risk of certain types of tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.