ArticlePloS one2017
Collective phenomena in crowds-Where pedestrian dynamics need social psychology.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.
- A mobile EEG study on the psychophysiological effects of walking and crowding in indoor and outdoor urban environments.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Boundary geometry controls a topological defect transition that determines lumen nucleation in embryonic development.Nature materials · 2026Article
- Behavioural repertoires in moving crowds: an observational approach.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Review
- Environmental memory boosts group formation of clueless individuals.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The connection between stress, density, and speed in crowds.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Waiting and walking with strangers: a socio-psychological pedestrian experiment on joint action in anonymous situations.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Steering self-organisation through confinement.Soft matter · 2023Review
- Article
- Evacuation in Buildings Based on BIM: Taking a Fire in a University Library as an Example.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- How people with disabilities influence crowd dynamics of pedestrian movement through bottlenecks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- An attempt to distinguish physical and socio-psychological influences on pedestrian bottleneck.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- A Hybrid Deep Learning and Visualization Framework for Pushing Behavior Detection in Pedestrian Dynamics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Advanced models for centroidal particle dynamics: short-range collision avoidance in dense crowds.Simulation · 2021Article
- Collective Dynamics of Ion Channels on Bilayer Lipid Membranes.ACS omega · 2021Article
- A Hybrid Tracking System of Full-Body Motion Inside Crowds.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Agent-based simulation of collective cooperation: from experiment to model.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Wayfinding as a Social Activity.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article is on collective phenomena in pedestrian dynamics during the assembling and dispersal of gatherings. To date pedestrian dynamics have been primarily studied in the natural and engineering sciences. Pedestrians are analyzed and modeled as driven particles revealing self-organizing phenomena and complex transport characteristics. However, pedestrians in crowds also behave as living beings according to stimulus-response mechanisms or act as human subjects on the basis of social norms, social identities or strategies. To show where pedestrian dynamics need social psychology in addition to the natural sciences we propose the application of three categories-phenomena, behavior and action. They permit a clear discrimination between situations in which minimal models from the natural sciences are appropriate and those in which sociological and psychological concepts are needed. To demonstrate the necessity of this framework, an experiment in which a large group of people (n = 270) enters a concert hall through two different spatial barrier structures is analyzed. These two structures correspond to everyday situations such as boarding trains and access to immigration desks. Methods from the natural and social sciences are applied. Firstly, physical measurements show the influence of the spatial structure on the dynamics of the entrance procedure. Density, waiting time and speed of progress show large variations. Secondly, a questionnaire study (n = 60) reveals how people perceive and evaluate these entrance situations. Markedly different expectations, social norms and strategies are associated with the two spatial structures. The results from the questionnaire study do not always conform to objective physical measures, indicating the limitations of models which are based on objective physical measures alone and which neglect subjective perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.