Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28591051›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2017

Association between red blood cell distribution width and Henoch-Schonlein purpura nephritis.

Hui Xu, Wei Li, Jian-Hua Mao, Yan-Xiang Pan

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hui XuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Wei Li
Jian-Hua Mao
Yan-Xiang Pan
Institute of Clinical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate whether red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a marker of the risk of Henoch-Schonlein purpura (HSP) nephritis (HSPN), a total of 669 HSP patients and 168 healthy controls were included in this retrospective study. Two hundred fifty-six (38.3%) of the patients had kidney involvement. Compared with the HSP group, RDW was significantly higher in the HSPN group (P < .001). Binary logistic regression identified that HSPN was independently associated with age, RDW, platelet, and total cholesterol (odds ratio = 1.409, 1.353, 0.996, and 2.019, respectively). In addition, RDW values of HSPN patients with crescents on histopathology (classes III, IV, and V) were higher compared with those of HSPN without crescents (classes I and II) (P = .019). The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the RDW at a cut-off point of 13.25 has 61% sensitivity and 79% specificity in predicting the presence of crescents on histopathology. It was first shown that RDW levels in HSPN are significantly higher than those in HSP without nephritis and healthy controls. RDW can be an independent predictor of HSPN and its levels greater than 13.25 were useful in the predicting the presence of crescents on histopathology.

Indexed as

Erythrocyte IndicesAge FactorsBiomarkersChildCholesterolErythrocytesFemaleHumansIgA VasculitisLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisNephritisOdds RatioPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersCholesterol

Identifiers

PMID28591051
PMCPMC5466229
OpenAlexW2622151645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.