ArticleMedicine2017
Inverted gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland mucosa type colliding with well differentiated adenocarcinoma: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case report and literature analysis of ectopic gastric glands combined with intestinal-type gastric cancer in an HP-negative background.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The white ring sign is useful for differentiating between fundic gland polyps and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type: A review of the literature.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Review
- Synchronous gastric MALT lymphoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type arising from a hamartomatous inverted polyp in a Helicobacter pylori naive patient.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Features of Gastric Epithelial Neoplasm of Fundic Gland Mucosa Lineage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Diagnosis and clinical implication of collision gastric adenocarcinomas: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2022Article
- Characteristic endoscopic findings of gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland mucosa type.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021Article
- Gastric epithelial neoplasm of fundic-gland mucosa lineage: proposal for a new classification in association with gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland type.Journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Long-term Observation of Gastric Adenocarcinoma of Fundic Gland Mucosa Type before and afterJournal of gastric cancer · 2021Article
- Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland: A review of clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognosis.Rare tumors · 2021Review
- Oxyntic gland neoplasm of the stomach: expanding the spectrum and proposal of terminology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020Article
- Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland mucosa type localized in the submucosa: A case report.Medicine · 2018Article
- Collision Tumor of the Stomach.Case reports in gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleGastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland mucosa type (GA-FGM) is a rare tumor composed of atypical cells with differentiation toward the fundic gland as well as the foveolar epithelium. Including our case, only 9 cases of GA-FGMs were reported from 2010 to 2016. CONCERNS OF THE PATIENT: An 87-year-old man was referred to our institution for endoscopic resection of a gastric lesion. The tumor was classified as type 0-I + IIa according to the Paris classification. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) revealed different structures of crypts and vessels among the components, illustrating the collision of 2 types of gastric cancer.
interventionsWe performed endoscopic submucosal dissection and successfully removed the tumor en bloc. OUTCOMES: The histological findings differed markedly between the 0-I lesion and the 0-IIa lesion. The superficial part of the 0-I lesion consisted of a papillary structure, and the deeper part consisted of a tubular structure that showed inverted downward growth to the submucosal layer with the lamina muscularis mucosae. Immunohistochemically, the superficial part of the 0-I lesion was positive for MUC5AC, which had differentiated to foveolar epithelium. The deeper part was positive for pepsinogen-I and MUC6, which had differentiated to fundic gland. The 0-I lesion was diagnosed as gastric phenotype of adenocarcinoma differentiated to fundic gland mucosa with upward growth in the superficial part and downward growth in the deeper part. The 0-IIa lesion was composed of a tubular structure positive for MUC2, and it was diagnosed as an intestinal phenotype of well differentiated adenocarcinoma. The boundary was clear, and no transitional tissue was observed between the 0-I and 0-IIa lesions, suggesting that the 0-I + IIa lesion was a gastric collision tumor of GA-FGM and well differentiated adenocarcinoma. LESSONS: We herein report the first case of inverted GA-FGM colliding with well differentiated adenocarcinoma. ME-NBI can be used to diagnose GA-FGM even if the lesion collides with other types of adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.