Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28591047›Full record

ArticleMedicine2017

Inverted gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland mucosa type colliding with well differentiated adenocarcinoma: A case report.

Keitaro Takahashi, Mikihiro Fujiya, Shin Ichihara, Kentaro Moriichi, Toshikatsu Okumura

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type: A review of the literature.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characteristic endoscopic findings of gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland mucosa type.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Oxyntic gland neoplasm of the stomach: expanding the spectrum and proposal of terminology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Collision Tumor of the Stomach.Case reports in gastroenterology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keitaro TakahashiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa Department of Surgical Pathology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Mikihiro Fujiya
Shin Ichihara
Kentaro Moriichi
Toshikatsu Okumura
Asahikawa Medical University · JPSapporo Kosei General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleGastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland mucosa type (GA-FGM) is a rare tumor composed of atypical cells with differentiation toward the fundic gland as well as the foveolar epithelium. Including our case, only 9 cases of GA-FGMs were reported from 2010 to 2016. CONCERNS OF THE PATIENT: An 87-year-old man was referred to our institution for endoscopic resection of a gastric lesion. The tumor was classified as type 0-I + IIa according to the Paris classification. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) revealed different structures of crypts and vessels among the components, illustrating the collision of 2 types of gastric cancer.

interventionsWe performed endoscopic submucosal dissection and successfully removed the tumor en bloc. OUTCOMES: The histological findings differed markedly between the 0-I lesion and the 0-IIa lesion. The superficial part of the 0-I lesion consisted of a papillary structure, and the deeper part consisted of a tubular structure that showed inverted downward growth to the submucosal layer with the lamina muscularis mucosae. Immunohistochemically, the superficial part of the 0-I lesion was positive for MUC5AC, which had differentiated to foveolar epithelium. The deeper part was positive for pepsinogen-I and MUC6, which had differentiated to fundic gland. The 0-I lesion was diagnosed as gastric phenotype of adenocarcinoma differentiated to fundic gland mucosa with upward growth in the superficial part and downward growth in the deeper part. The 0-IIa lesion was composed of a tubular structure positive for MUC2, and it was diagnosed as an intestinal phenotype of well differentiated adenocarcinoma. The boundary was clear, and no transitional tissue was observed between the 0-I and 0-IIa lesions, suggesting that the 0-I + IIa lesion was a gastric collision tumor of GA-FGM and well differentiated adenocarcinoma. LESSONS: We herein report the first case of inverted GA-FGM colliding with well differentiated adenocarcinoma. ME-NBI can be used to diagnose GA-FGM even if the lesion collides with other types of adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialGastric MucosaGastroscopyHumansMaleStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28591047
PMCPMC5466225
OpenAlexW2622075177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.