ArticleMedicine2017
Diabetes self-assessment score and the development of diabetes: A 10-year prospective study.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a clinical risk score for incident diabetes: A 10-year prospective cohort study.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To verify that the Korean Diabetes Score (KDS), a self-assessment, predicts the risk of diabetes in various comprehensive risk models, and to investigate factors that enhance its predictive ability in a large cohort. We analyzed 8735 adults without diabetes in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study, an ongoing large community-based 10-year cohort study. Incident diabetes was defined as fasting blood glucose ≥126 mg/dL or postload 2-hour glucose ≥200 mg/dL by 75 g oral glucose tolerance test conducted biennually, or currently taking medication for diabetes. Hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox regression were calculated for relative risk of developing diabetes as associated with the KDS, and performance of risk models was assessed by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Of 8735 participants, 1497 (17.1%) developed diabetes over 10 years. The prevalence of incident diabetes was 10.3% in people with a KDS <5 and was 21.8% in those with KDS ≥5 (P < .001). Increasing KDS was significantly associated with developing diabetes (adjusted HR: 1.13; 95% confidence interval:1.09,1.18). The comprehensive prediction model with KDS added to fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, postload 2-hour glucose, and triglyceride showed a markedly higher AUC (0.782) compared to KDS alone (0.641). A low insulinogenic index (IGI) level, but not insulin resistance, was a significant determinant of developing diabetes in subjects who had baseline KDS < 5. We confirmed that KDS as a 10-year risk model to predict diabetes becomes more potent when added to relevant laboratory parameters. Beta-cell function as assessed by IGI should be taken into account when predicting diabetes using the KDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.