Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28590463›Full record

ArticleHeredity2017

Prediction and association mapping of agronomic traits in maize using multiple omic data.

Y Xu, C Xu, S Xu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Prediction of disease resilience of pigs using multi-omics data.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-Wide Association Study for Resistance toPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Climate Change-The Rise of Climate-Resilient Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Multi-omics assists genomic prediction of maize yield with machine learning approaches.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Y XuDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
C XuJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics of Ministry of Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
S XuDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection holds a great promise to accelerate plant breeding via early selection before phenotypes are measured, and it offers major advantages over marker-assisted selection for highly polygenic traits. In addition to genomic data, metabolome and transcriptome are increasingly receiving attention as new data sources for phenotype prediction. We used data available from maize as a model to compare the predictive abilities of three different omic data sources using eight representative methods for six traits. We found that the best linear unbiased prediction overall performs better than other methods across different traits and different omic data, and genomic prediction performs better than transcriptomic and metabolomic predictions. For the same maize data, we also conducted genome-wide association study, transcriptome-wide association studies and metabolome-wide association studies for the six agronomic traits using both the genome-wide efficient mixed model association (GEMMA) method and a modified least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. The new LASSO method has the ability to perform statistical tests. Simulation studies show that the modified LASSO performs better than GEMMA in terms of high power and low Type 1 error.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingMultifactorial InheritanceBayes TheoremGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Association StudiesGenomicsLeast-Squares AnalysisLikelihood FunctionsLinear ModelsMetabolomicsModels, GeneticSupport Vector MachineZea mays

Identifiers

PMID28590463
PMCPMC5564377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.