Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28590444›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

Consumers' Preferences for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Product Features: A Structured Content Analysis.

Christine E Kistler, Trisha M Crutchfield, Erin L Sutfin, Leah M Ranney, Micah L Berman, Gary A Zarkin, Adam O Goldstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. General and Device-Specific Reasons for ENDS Use: A Qualitative Study with Adult ENDS Users.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Hookah and Electronic Inhalant Device Use and Perceptions Among African American Youth and Young Adults: Are We Asking the Right Questions?Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Orthodox and Unorthodox Uses of Electronic Cigarettes: A Surveillance of YouTube Video Content.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perceptions and Reasons Regarding E-Cigarette Use among Users and Non-Users: A Narrative Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  16. Lack of Substantial Post-Cessation Weight Increase in Electronic Cigarettes Users.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christine E KistlerDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Christine_Kistler@med.unc.edu.
Trisha M CrutchfieldLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. trisha@unc.edu.
Erin L SutfinDepartment of Social Science and Health Policy, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27599, USA. esutfin@wakehealth.edu.
Leah M RanneyDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. leah_ranney@unc.edu.
Micah L BermanCollege of Public Health & Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. mberman@cph.osu.edu.
Gary A ZarkinBehavioral Health and Criminal Justice Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27599, USA. gaz@rti.org.
Adam O GoldsteinDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. adam_goldstein@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USRTI International · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To inform potential governmental regulations, we aimed to develop a list of electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) product features important to U.S. consumers by age and gender. We employed qualitative data methods. Participants were eligible if they had used an ENDS at least once. Groups were selected by age and gender (young adult group aged 18-25,

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overConsumer BehaviorElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaSmoking CessationYoung Adultconsumer preferenceselectronic nicotine delivery systemqualitative

Identifiers

PMID28590444
PMCPMC5486299
OpenAlexW2622336820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.