Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28589862›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2017

Taking promoters out of enhancers in sequence based predictions of tissue-specific mammalian enhancers.

Julia Herman-Izycka, Michal Wlasnowolski, Bartek Wilczynski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia Herman-IzyckaInstitute of Informatics, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2, Warsaw, 02-097, Poland.
Michal WlasnowolskiInstitute of Informatics, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2, Warsaw, 02-097, Poland.
Bartek WilczynskiInstitute of Informatics, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2, Warsaw, 02-097, Poland. bartek@mimuw.edu.pl.
University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany genetic diseases are caused by mutations in non-coding regions of the genome. These mutations are frequently found in enhancer sequences, causing disruption to the regulatory program of the cell. Enhancers are short regulatory sequences in the non-coding part of the genome that are essential for the proper regulation of transcription. While the experimental methods for identification of such sequences are improving every year, our understanding of the rules behind the enhancer activity has not progressed much in the last decade. This is especially true in case of tissue-specific enhancers, where there are clear problems in predicting specificity of enhancer activity.

resultsWe show a random-forest based machine learning approach capable of matching the performance of the current state-of-the-art methods for enhancer prediction. Then we show that it is, similarly to other published methods, frequently cross-predicting enhancers as active in different tissues, making it less useful for predicting tissue specific activity. Then we proceed to show that the problem is related to the fact that the enhancer predicting models exhibit a bias towards predicting gene promoters as active enhancers. Then we show that using a two-step classifier can lead to lower cross-prediction between tissues.

conclusionsWe provide whole-genome predictions of human heart and brain enhancers obtained with two-step classifier.

Indexed as

Base SequenceEnhancer Elements, GeneticGenomicsHistonesHumansOrgan SpecificityPromoter Regions, GeneticHistonesEnhancer predictionHistone modificationsMachine learningRegulatory sequence

Identifiers

PMID28589862
PMCPMC5461523
OpenAlexW2619871835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.