ArticleBMC medical genomics2017
Taking promoters out of enhancers in sequence based predictions of tissue-specific mammalian enhancers.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovering the complete enhancer map of human herpesviruses using a natural language processing model.Nature communications · 2025Article
- An explainable artificial intelligence approach for decoding the enhancer histone modifications code and identification of novel enhancers in Drosophila.Genome biology · 2021Article
- K-mer Content Changes with Node Degree in Promoter-Enhancer Network of Mouse ES Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- In Silico Analysis of Gene Expression Change Associated with Copy Number of Enhancers in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Sequence Characteristics Distinguish Transcribed Enhancers from Promoters and Predict Their Breadth of Activity.Genetics · 2019Article
- REDfly: the transcriptional regulatory element database for Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- PrESOgenesis: A two-layer multi-label predictor for identifying fertility-related proteins using support vector machine and pseudo amino acid composition approach.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Evolution of Translational Bioinformatics: lessons learned from TBC 2016.BMC medical genomics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany genetic diseases are caused by mutations in non-coding regions of the genome. These mutations are frequently found in enhancer sequences, causing disruption to the regulatory program of the cell. Enhancers are short regulatory sequences in the non-coding part of the genome that are essential for the proper regulation of transcription. While the experimental methods for identification of such sequences are improving every year, our understanding of the rules behind the enhancer activity has not progressed much in the last decade. This is especially true in case of tissue-specific enhancers, where there are clear problems in predicting specificity of enhancer activity.
resultsWe show a random-forest based machine learning approach capable of matching the performance of the current state-of-the-art methods for enhancer prediction. Then we show that it is, similarly to other published methods, frequently cross-predicting enhancers as active in different tissues, making it less useful for predicting tissue specific activity. Then we proceed to show that the problem is related to the fact that the enhancer predicting models exhibit a bias towards predicting gene promoters as active enhancers. Then we show that using a two-step classifier can lead to lower cross-prediction between tissues.
conclusionsWe provide whole-genome predictions of human heart and brain enhancers obtained with two-step classifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.