Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28589854›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2017

A disease similarity matrix based on the uniqueness of shared genes.

Matthew B Carson, Cong Liu, Yao Lu, Caiyan Jia, Hui Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PCOSKBScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew B CarsonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 N Lake Shore Dr, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Cong LiuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 S Morgan St, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Yao LuCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Shanghai Children's Hospital, 24 W Beijing Rd, Suite 1400, Shanghai, 200000, China.
Caiyan JiaDepartment of Computer Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, No.3 Shangyuancun, Haidian District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Hui LuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 S Morgan St, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA. huilu@uic.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex diseases involve many genes, and these genes are often associated with several different illnesses. Disease similarity measurement can be based on shared genotype or phenotype. Quantifying relationships between genes can reveal previously unknown connections and form a reference base for therapy development and drug repurposing.

methodsHere we introduce a method to measure disease similarity that incorporates the uniqueness of shared genes. For each disease pair, we calculated the uniqueness score and constructed disease similarity matrices using OMIM and Disease Ontology annotation.

resultsUsing the Disease Ontology-based matrix, we identified several interesting connections between cancer and other disease and conditions such as malaria, along with studies to support our findings. We also found several high scoring pairwise relationships for which there was little or no literature support, highlighting potentially interesting connections warranting additional study.

conclusionsWe developed a co-occurrence matrix based on gene uniqueness to examine the relationships between diseases from OMIM and DORIF data. Our similarity matrix can be used to identify potential disease relationships and to motivate further studies investigating the causal mechanisms in diseases.

Indexed as

Gene OntologyComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDiseaseMolecular Sequence AnnotationClusteringDisease-disease similarityDisease-related genes

Identifiers

PMID28589854
PMCPMC5461528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.