Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28589320›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2017

Impact of the round window membrane accessibility on hearing preservation in adult cochlear implantation.

Marjan Mirsalehi, Saleh Mohebbi, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh, Thomas Lenarz, Omid Majdani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marjan MirsalehiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. mmirsalehi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-5653
Saleh MohebbiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Mahsa GhajarzadehUniversal Council of Epidemiology (UCE), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.
Thomas LenarzDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Omid MajdaniDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEImam Khomeini Hospital · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the round window membrane accessibility on the residual hearing after cochlear implantation surgery in adults. Moreover, the effects of the other demographics and intra-operative factors on the residual hearing loss have been evaluated. The hearing preservation cochlear implantation surgery was performed on 64 adults with residual hearing thresholds ≤80 dB at 250 and 500 Hz, who had referred to our tertiary academic center. All the patients underwent a standardized surgical approach with the same straight electrode inserted through the round window membrane. The hearing thresholds at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz were compared in pre-operative and 1 month postoperative pure-tone audiograms. The average hearing threshold shifts at these frequencies was used to evaluate the hearing preservation. The effects of the round window accessibility and other factors (including gender, age, side of the surgery, necessity of anterior-inferior drilling of the round window margin and average insertion speed) on hearing threshold shifts were analyzed. The mean low-frequency hearing threshold shift was found to be 17.5 dB for all the patients. The hearing preservation goal (threshold shifts ≤30 dB) was achieved in 58 patients. Among the evaluated parameters, only accessibility of the round window membrane could change the hearing threshold shifts significantly (p = 0.026), and was a predictor for the hearing loss (B coefficient = 7.5, p = 0.006). Incomplete accessibility of the round window membrane may be a predictor for increased hearing threshold shifts in short-term evaluations after cochlear implantation.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationHearing LossPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAge FactorsAudiometry, Pure-ToneCochlear ImplantsFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsIranMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareRisk FactorsRound Window, EarCochlear implantationHearing preservationRound window insertionRound window membrane accessibility gradeThe slim electrode

Identifiers

PMID28589320
OpenAlexW2622795564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.