Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28589299›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2017

Implementation and Evaluation of a Clinical Pathway for Pancreaticoduodenectomy Procedures: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Marion van der Kolk, Mark van den Boogaard, Femke Becking-Verhaar, Hettie Custers, Hans van der Hoeven, Peter Pickkers, Kees van Laarhoven

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of rehabilitation in stroke patients in a High Dependency Unit.American journal of translational research · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marion van der KolkDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Marion.vanderKolk@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0294-0496
Mark van den BoogaardDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Femke Becking-VerhaarDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hettie CustersDepartment of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hans van der HoevenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kees van LaarhovenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical and nursing protocols in perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy are mainly mono-disciplinary, limiting their integration and transparency in a continuous health care system. The aims of this study were to evaluate adherence to a multidisciplinary clinical pathway for all pancreaticoduodenectomy patients during their entire hospital stay and to determine if the use of this clinical pathway is associated with beneficial effects on clinical end points. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted in 95 pancreaticoduodenectomy patients treated according to a clinical pathway, including a variance report, compared to a historical control group (n = 52) with a traditional treatment regime.

resultsProcess evaluation of the clinical pathway group revealed that protocol adherence throughout all units was above 80%. Major complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥3 decreased from 27 to 13%; p = 0.02. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the clinical pathway group, median 10 days [IQR 8-15], compared with the control group, median 13 days [IQR 10-18]; p = 0.02.

conclusionThe use of a clinical pathway in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients was associated with high protocol adherence, improved outcome and shorter hospital length of stay. Variance report analysis and protocol adherence with a Prepare-Act-Reflect Cycle are essential in surveillance of outcome.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysGuideline AdherenceInterdisciplinary CommunicationPancreaticoduodenectomyAgedClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Care TeamPerioperative CareProspective StudiesClinical pathwayPancreaticoduodenectomyPerioperative careProtocol adherence

Identifiers

PMID28589299
OpenAlexW2623072245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.