Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28589221›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2017

An efficient method to generate conditional knockout cell lines for essential genes by combination of auxin-inducible degron tag and CRISPR/Cas9.

Kohei Nishimura, Tatsuo Fukagawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Rice (Genes · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rapid Degradation ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kohei NishimuraGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tatsuo FukagawaGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. tfukagawa@fbs.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-8564-6852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generation of cells with a loss-of-function mutation in a gene (knockout cells) is a valuable technique for studying the function of a given gene product. However, if the product of the target gene is essential for cell viability, conditional knockout cell lines must be generated. Recently, as gene editing technology using CRISPR/Cas9 has developed, it has become possible to produce conditional knockout cell lines using this technique. However, to obtain final conditional knockout cell lines, it is necessary to perform several experiments with multiple complicated steps. In this paper, we introduce an easy and efficient method to generate conditional knockout cell lines based on combining auxin-inducible degron (AID) technology with CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Our method only requires performing a single transfection and is therefore an easy and rapid method to obtain a conditional knockout cell line.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene Knockout TechniquesGenes, EssentialBase SequenceCell LineDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression RegulationGene OrderGenetic LociIndoleacetic AcidsTransfectionDNA-Binding ProteinsIndoleacetic AcidsAidCRISPR/Cas9Rapid degradation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.