Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28589057›Full record

ReviewTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2017

Treatment of Sydenham's Chorea: A Review of the Current Evidence.

Shannon L Dean, Harvey S Singer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rare Recurrence of Sydenham Chorea in an Adult: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Therapeutic aspects of Sydenham's Chorea: an update.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022
    Review
  12. Cardiac Involvement in Movement Disorders.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2021
    Review
  13. Acute Movement Disorders in Childhood.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Chorea in children: etiology, diagnostic approach and management.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Review
  16. Treatment of Disorders of Tone and Other Considerations in Pediatric Movement Disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Localising movement disorders in childhood.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2019
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shannon L DeanDepartment of Child Neurology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Harvey S SingerDepartment of Child Neurology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSydenham's chorea (SC), the neurologic manifestation of rheumatic fever, remains the most prevalent form of chorea in children. Suggested treatments of chorea in SC include prophylactic penicillin, symptomatic (antipsychotic and anticonvulsant) medications, and immunomodulatory therapy (steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and plasma exchange). In this manuscript, we undertook a systematic review of the published literature to examine the data supporting these therapeutic recommendations.

methodsA search of PubMed, Embase, Psychinfo, and clinicaltrials.gov was conducted for publications pertaining to the treatment of SC/rheumatic chorea from 1956 to 2016.

resultsPenicillin prophylaxis appears to reduce the likelihood of further cardiac complications and the recurrence rate of chorea. Data on symptomatic therapy for chorea are limited to individual case reports or series and rare comparison studies. The efficacy of steroid use is supported by a single placebo-controlled study and several case series. Information on other immunomodulatory therapies such as IVIG and plasmapheresis are limited to a small number of reports and a single comparison study. DISCUSSION: Treatment decisions in SC are currently based on the treating physician's clinical experience, the desire to avoid side effects, and the existence of only limited scientific evidence. Based on a review of the available literature, chorea often improves with symptomatic therapy and immunotherapy tends to be reserved for those who fail to respond. Steroids are beneficial; however, data using IVIG and plasmapheresis are very limited. Larger, well-controlled studies, using standardized assessment scales, are required if therapeutic decisions for SC are to be based on meaningful information.

Indexed as

antipsychoticimmunomodulatoryrheumatic choreaSydenham’s choreatreatmentvalproic acid

Identifiers

PMID28589057
PMCPMC5459984
OpenAlexW2620904777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.