Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28589023›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2017

Measuring, manipulating and exploiting behaviours of adult mosquitoes to optimise malaria vector control impact.

Gerry F Killeen, John M Marshall, Samson S Kiware, Andy B South, Lucy S Tusting, Prosper P Chaki, Nicodem J Govella

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04149119 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Attractive Targeted Sugar Bait Phase III Trial in Mali

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Clinical Research Center, MaliRan2022 to 2024Enrolled2,100ConditionsVector TransmissionArmsAttractive Target Sugar Baits (ATSB)
NCT05219565 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Phase III, Open-label, Community-based, Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Cost-effectiveness, and Acceptability of Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits (ATSB) for Malaria Burden Reduction in Western Kenya

TypeinterventionalSponsorLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineRan2022 to 2024Enrolled2,962ConditionsMalariaArmsAttractive Targeted Sugar Bait (ATSB)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Topical repellents for malaria prevention.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gerry F KilleenEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara and Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-8583-8739
John M MarshallDivisions of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Samson S KiwareEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara and Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Andy B SouthNorwich, UK.
Lucy S TustingOxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Prosper P ChakiEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara and Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Nicodem J GovellaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara and Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N011570/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residual malaria transmission can persist despite high coverage with effective long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and/or indoor residual spraying (IRS), because many vector mosquitoes evade them by feeding on animals, feeding outdoors, resting outdoors or rapidly exiting from houses after entering them. However, many of these behaviours that render vectors resilient to control with IRS and LLINs also make them vulnerable to some emerging new alternative interventions. Furthermore, vector control measures targeting preferred behaviours of mosquitoes often force them to express previously rare alternative behaviours, which can then be targeted with these complementary new interventions. For example, deployment of LLINs against vectors that historically fed predominantly indoors on humans typically results in persisting transmission by residual populations that survive by feeding outdoors on humans and animals, where they may then be targeted with vapour-phase insecticides and veterinary insecticides, respectively. So while the ability of mosquitoes to express alternative behaviours limits the impact of LLINs and IRS, it also creates measurable and unprecedented opportunities for deploying complementary additional approaches that would otherwise be ineffective. Now that more diverse vector control methods are finally becoming available, well-established entomological field techniques for surveying adult mosquito behaviours should be fully exploited by national malaria control programmes, to rationally and adaptively map out new opportunities for their effective deployment.

Identifiers

PMID28589023
PMCPMC5444085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.