Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28589022›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2017

Developing an expanded vector control toolbox for malaria elimination.

Gerry F Killeen, Allison Tatarsky, Abdoulaye Diabate, Carlos J Chaccour, John M Marshall, Fredros O Okumu, Shannon Brunner, Gretchen Newby, Yasmin A Williams, David Malone and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A stable nanoliposomal carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Spatial temporal distribution ofGigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gerry F KilleenEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-8583-8739
Allison TatarskyMalaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abdoulaye DiabateInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Carlos J ChaccourInstituto de Salud Global, Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
John M MarshallDivisions of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Fredros O OkumuEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, United Republic of Tanzania.
Shannon BrunnerMalaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Gretchen NewbyMalaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Yasmin A WilliamsMalaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
David MaloneInnovative Vector Control Consortium, Liverpool, UK.
Lucy S TustingOxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roland D GoslingMalaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N011570/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vector control using long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) accounts for most of the malaria burden reductions achieved recently in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). LLINs and IRS are highly effective, but are insufficient to eliminate malaria transmission in many settings because of operational constraints, growing resistance to available insecticides and mosquitoes that behaviourally avoid contact with these interventions. However, a number of substantive opportunities now exist for rapidly developing and implementing more diverse, effective and sustainable malaria vector control strategies for LMICs. For example, mosquito control in high-income countries is predominantly achieved with a combination of mosquito-proofed housing and environmental management, supplemented with large-scale insecticide applications to larval habitats and outdoor spaces that kill off vector populations en masse, but all these interventions remain underused in LMICs. Programmatic development and evaluation of decentralised, locally managed systems for delivering these proactive mosquito population abatement practices in LMICs could therefore enable broader scale-up. Furthermore, a diverse range of emerging or repurposed technologies are becoming available for targeting mosquitoes when they enter houses, feed outdoors, attack livestock, feed on sugar or aggregate into mating swarms. Global policy must now be realigned to mobilise the political and financial support necessary to exploit these opportunities over the decade ahead, so that national malaria control and elimination programmes can access a much broader, more effective set of vector control interventions.

Identifiers

PMID28589022
PMCPMC5444090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.