ArticleBMJ global health2016
Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: a systematic review.
Article in BMJ global health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to reintroduce or increase assisted vaginal births: a systematic review of the literature.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Morbidity after surgical management of cervical cancer in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- The effect of midwifery-led continuum of care to improve maternal and newborn outcomes in the Sidama region, Ethiopia: A non-randomized control trial study.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Midwife-led birthing centres in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Uganda: an economic evaluation of case study sites.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Insights gained through exploring UK midwifery care by US midwifery graduate students in a short-term study abroad: A qualitative study.European journal of midwifery · 2024Article
- Midwife-led birthing centres in four countries: a case study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Improving obstetric care in low-resource settings.Case reports in women's health · 2022Article
- The MIDWIZE conceptual framework: a midwife-led care model that fits the Swedish health care system might after contextualization, fit others.BMC research notes · 2022Review
- Advancing quality and safety of perinatal services in India: opportunities for effective midwifery integration.Health policy and planning · 2022Article
- Trends in socio-economic, sex and geographic disparities in childhood underweight in Mauritania: evidence from Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (2007-2015).International health · 2022Article
- Developing a midwifery service task list for Chinese midwives in the task-shifting context: a Delphi study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Barriers to implementing guideline recommendations to improve childbirth care: a rapid review of evidence.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2021Review
- Health system redesign for maternal and newborn survival: rethinking care models to close the global equity gap.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Midwife Led Units: Transforming Maternity Care Globally.Annals of global health · 2020Article
- [Barriers to implementing guideline recommendations to improve childbirth care: rapid review of evidenceObstáculos a la aplicación de las recomendaciones para la atención del parto normal: revisión rápida de evidencia].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2020Article
- Redesigning maternal health services: is centralisation the answer in low-resource settings?BMJ global health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo ensure timely access to comprehensive emergency obstetric care in low- and middle-income countries, a number of interventions have been employed. This systematic review assesses the effects of onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) embedded within hospitals which provide comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care.
methodsBoth interventional and observational studies that compared OMBUs with standard medical-led obstetric care were eligible for inclusion. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation and Social Sciences Citation Index, Global Health Library and one Chinese database were searched. Meta-analysis was conducted to synthesise data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Findings of observational studies were summarised by forest plots with brief narratives.
resultsThree RCTs, one controlled before-and-after study and six cohort studies were included. There were no or very few maternal and perinatal deaths in either OMBUs or standard obstetric units, with no significant differences between the two. Women giving birth in OMBUs were less likely to use epidural analgesia (risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82; three trials, n=2431). The UK national cohort study and two other cohorts in China and Nepal found less oxytocin augmentation, more spontaneous vaginal deliveries, fewer caesarean sections and fewer episiotomies performed in OMBUs than in standard obstetric units. These differences were not statistically significant in RCTs and the remaining cohorts. One study investigated satisfaction with midwife-led birth care among women and midwives, with positive findings in both groups favouring OMBUs. In addition, two studies found that the total cost of birth was lower in OMBUs than in standard obstetric units.
conclusionsOMBUs could be an alternative model for providing safe and cost-effective childbirth care, which may be particularly important in low- and middle-income countries to meet the growing demand for facility-based birth for low-risk women and improve efficiency of health systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.