Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28588889›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2017

Validation of the Crohn's and Ulcerative Colitis questionnaire in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Hayley A Hutchings, Laith Alrubiay, Alan Watkins, W-Y Cheung, Anne C Seagrove, John G Williams

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient experiences in ulcerative colitis: conceptual model and review of patient-reported outcome measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hayley A HutchingsSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Laith AlrubiaySwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Alan WatkinsSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
W-Y CheungSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Anne C SeagroveSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
John G WilliamsSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Swansea University · GB

Funding

Department of Health 06/78/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Crohn's and Ulcerative Colitis questionnaire (CUCQ) has previously been validated in patients with mild to moderate Crohn's and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to validate the tool in patients with acute severe UC.

methodsWe undertook a validation of the CUCQ in patients recruited to the COmparison of iNfliximab and ciclosporin in STeroid Resistant Ulcerative Colitis Trial (CONSTRUCT). We carried out psychometric analysis to examine the underlying dimensions of the scale, internal consistency and construct validity. We carried out stepwise regression to examine which items accounted for the greatest variance in the scale.

resultsWe obtained complete data for 270 patients. The internal consistency of the CUCQ was excellent (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8). The CUCQ scores achieved significant correlations with two generic quality of life scales (SF-12 and EQ-5D), demonstrating good construct validity. Stepwise regression identified 16 items that accounted for greater than 95% of the variance of the CUCQ. Only three of the eight items selected for a short form in mild to moderate patients were selected for patients with acute severe UC.

conclusionsThe CUCQ demonstrated good validity in our sample of acute severe UC patients. Stepwise regression identified potential to shorten the tool, but that different items would be selected compared with less severe patients. If the tool is to be applied across the spectrum of disease it would be more appropriate to use the full 32 items in the scale. Further work to explore test-retest is required in acute patients.

Indexed as

Inflammatory bowel diseasepatient-reported outcome measuresquality of lifeulcerative colitisvalidation

Identifiers

PMID28588889
PMCPMC5446145
OpenAlexW2522786032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.