ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2017
Analysis of the incidence of tumor lysis syndrome in patients with hematological malignancies treated with rasburicase.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in patients with hematological malignancies treated with rasburicase, and to evaluate the dose and duration of rasburicase administration. A total of 52 patients were enrolled. The background of the patients, incidence of TLS and laboratory data were retrospectively examined; in addition, the dose and duration of rasburicase administration and the factors affecting the onset of TLS were evaluated and compared among TLS risk categories. During the study period, 2 (3.8%) of the patients developed clinical TLS and 24 (46.2%) developed laboratory TLS (LTLS). Although the LTLS rate was very high, there were no life-threatening cases of TLS. The median daily dose of rasburicase administered to all patients was 7.5 mg/day (interquartile range, 7.5-9.0 mg/day), and the daily weight-based dose was 0.147 mg/kg/day (range, 0.126-0.178 mg/kg/day). The administration duration was 3 days (interquartile range, 3-4 days). Additionally, there was no significant association between TLS risk classification and daily rasburicase administration dose, duration, or post-administration laboratory data. The factors affecting the onset of TLS included serum uric acid level, as well as serum creatinine and phosphate levels. Rasburicase was highly effective in the prevention and management of hyperuricemia, even at a low-dose (7.5 mg/day) and a duration that was 3 days shorter compared with that recommended by the manufacturer. Therefore, clinicians should administer rasburicase based on their clinical judgment, taking into consideration the cost-effectiveness of this therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.