Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28588400›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2017

Quantum effects in biology: golden rule in enzymes, olfaction, photosynthesis and magnetodetection.

Jennifer C Brookes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantum Biology; From Classic Medical Physics to Quantum Medicine.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. What is quantum biology?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. How Does Genetic Information Enable Life?Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Bioelectrical synchronization ofRoyal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Photobiomodulation therapy.JADA foundational science · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. MiMiCPy: An Efficient Toolkit for MiMiC-Based QM/MM Simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jennifer C BrookesLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, 17-19 Gordon Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8235-2290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite certain quantum concepts, such as superposition states, entanglement, 'spooky action at a distance' and tunnelling through insulating walls, being somewhat counterintuitive, they are no doubt extremely useful constructs in theoretical and experimental physics. More uncertain, however, is whether or not these concepts are fundamental to biology and living processes. Of course, at the fundamental level all things are quantum, because all things are built from the quantized states and rules that govern atoms. But when does the quantum mechanical toolkit become the best tool for the job? This review looks at four areas of 'quantum effects in biology'. These are biosystems that are very diverse in detail but possess some commonality. They are all (i)

Indexed as

enzymesmagnetodetectionolfactionphotosynthesisquantum

Identifiers

PMID28588400
PMCPMC5454345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.