Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28588128›Full record

ArticlemBio2017

Novel Chromosome Organization Pattern in

Kati Böhm, Fabian Meyer, Agata Rhomberg, Jörn Kalinowski, Catriona Donovan, Marc Bramkamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Physiological changes and growth behavior ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Journal of bacteriology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kati BöhmLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Fakultät Biologie, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Fabian MeyerLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Fakultät Biologie, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Agata RhombergLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Fakultät Biologie, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Jörn KalinowskiUniversität Bielefeld, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld, Germany.
Catriona DonovanLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Fakultät Biologie, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Marc BramkampLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Fakultät Biologie, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany marc.bramkamp@lmu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria regulate chromosome replication and segregation tightly with cell division to ensure faithful segregation of DNA to daughter generations. The underlying mechanisms have been addressed in several model species. It became apparent that bacteria have evolved quite different strategies to regulate DNA segregation and chromosomal organization. We have investigated here how the actinobacterium

Indexed as

DiploidyDNA ReplicationBacterial ProteinsCell DivisionChromosomes, BacterialChromosome SegregationCorynebacterium glutamicumReplication OriginBacterial Proteinschromosome partition proteins, bacterialcell cycleCorynebacteriumdiploidyoriginParAParBreplication

Identifiers

PMID28588128
PMCPMC5461407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.