Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28587978›Full record

ArticleJournal of dentistry2017

A new arginine-based dental adhesive system: formulation, mechanical and anti-caries properties.

Saulo Geraldeli, Eveline F Soares, Andres J Alvarez, Tanaz Farivar, Robert C Shields, Mario A C Sinhoreti, Marcelle M Nascimento

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dentistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibacterial effect of a dental adhesive containing SCH-79797 onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Modulating pH through lysine integrated dental adhesives.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Saulo GeraldeliDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Eveline F SoaresDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Andres J AlvarezCollege of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Tanaz FarivarDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Robert C ShieldsDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Mario A C SinhoretiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Marcelle M NascimentoDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address: mnascimento@dental.ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

Oral alkali production and caries prevention in childrenK23DE023579 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NASCIMENTO, MARCELLE M. · 2014 to 2018
$647k
NIDCR NIH HHS K23 DE023579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary caries at the margins of composite restorations has been attributed to adhesive failure and consequent accumulation of cariogenic biofilms.

objectivesTo develop and evaluate an etch-and-rinse adhesive system containing arginine for sustainable release and recharge without affecting its mechanical properties. Arginine metabolism by oral bacteria generates ammonia, which neutralizes glycolytic acids and creates a neutral environmental pH that is less favorable to the growth of caries pathogens, thus reducing the caries risk at the tooth-composite interface.

methodsExperimental adhesives were formulated with methacrylate monomers and arginine at 5%, 7%, and 10% or no arginine (control). Adhesives were tested for: (i) mechanical properties of true stress (FS and UTS), modulus of elasticity (E), degree of conversion (DC), Knoop hardness number (KHN) and dentin microtensile bond strength (μ-TBS), (ii) arginine release and recharge, and (iii) antibacterial activities. Data was analyzed by t-test, one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests.

resultsFS and UTS results showed no statistically significant differences between the 7% arginine-adhesive and control, while the results for E, DC, KHN and μ-TBS showed no difference among all groups. The 7% arginine-adhesive showed a high release rate of arginine (75.0μmol/cm

conclusionsIncorporation of 7% arginine did not affect the physical and mechanical properties of the adhesive. Arginine was released from the adhesive at a rate and concentration that exhibited antibacterial effects, regardless of shifts in biofilm conditions such as sugar availability and pH. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Secondary caries is recognized as the main reason for failure of dental restorations. The development of an arginine-based adhesive system has the potential to dramatically reduce the incidence and severity of secondary caries in adhesive restorations in a very economical fashion.

Indexed as

Acid Etching, DentalAmmoniaArginineBacteriaBiofilmsBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateComposite ResinsDental BondingDental CariesDental CementsDental LeakageDental Stress AnalysisDentinDentin-Bonding AgentsElasticityHardnessAmmoniaArginineBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateComposite ResinsDental CementsDentin-Bonding AgentsMethacrylatesResin CementsArginineCariesDental adhesivesOral biofilmsSecondary caries

Identifiers

PMID28587978
PMCPMC5568561
OpenAlexW2621338196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.