Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28587895›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2017

A novel operant task to assess social reward and motivation in rodents.

Johnathan M Borland, Kyle J Frantz, Lauren M Aiani, Kymberly N Grantham, Zhimin Song, H Elliott Albers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dichotomous Regulation of Social Behaviors by Nucleus Accumbens Neurons in Female and Male Syrian Hamsters.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The social origins of consciousness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sex-dependent regulation of social reward by oxytocin receptors in the ventral tegmental area.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johnathan M BorlandNeuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kyle J FrantzNeuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lauren M AianiNeuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kymberly N GranthamNeuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Zhimin SongNeuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
H Elliott AlbersNeuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: biohea@gsu.edu.
Georgia State University · US

Funding

Sex Differences in the Social BrainR01MH110212 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERS, H. ELLIOTT, MICHOPOULOS, VASILIKI · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial reward plays a critical role in the development of beneficial social relationships, and disorders of the mechanisms controlling social reward are involved in the etiology of many psychiatric diseases. NEW

methodWe present a novel operant social preference task to quantify social reward in rodents using an apparatus with three chambers separated by one-way vertical-swing doors. The experimental animal is placed in the larger chamber while the two smaller chambers either remain empty or contain a stimulus animal or other potential reward stimulus. Adding weights to the door can alter effort required for rewards.

resultsHamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) entered the chamber containing a stimulus hamster significantly more frequently than an empty chamber. When the reinforcing effects of social interactions were compared to food reward under progressive cost requirements, the reinforcing effects of social interaction and sunflower seeds were similar. Progressively increasing the door weight decreased number of entries, but increased time spent attempting to open the doors. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsThe quantification of the rewarding properties of social interactions has almost exclusively used the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. Although robust and reliable, CPP includes a memory component, because it relies on the association of place with the social interaction while the operant task presented here does not.

conclusionsThis task allows for detailed and direct assessment of social and non-social rewards that may serve as effective behavioral reinforcers in this operant conditioning model, and it can be used to investigate the neural mechanisms regulating motivation.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantMotivationPsychological TestsRewardSocial BehaviorAnimalsEquipment DesignFoodMaleMesocricetusSpatial BehaviorVisual PerceptionApparatusDopamineFood rewardHamstersPlace preferenceSocial motivation

Identifiers

PMID28587895
PMCPMC7093839
OpenAlexW2621169023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.