Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28587686›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2017

SOCIETAL PERSPECTIVE ON COST DRIVERS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN SINDH, PAKISTAN.

Asif Raza Khowaja, Craig Mitton, Rahat Qureshi, Stirling Bryan, Laura A Magee, Peter von Dadelszen, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Asif Raza KhowajaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,and British Columbia Children's Hospital,University of British Columbia,Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation,Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute,Division of Women & Child Health,Aga Khan University.
Craig MittonCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation,Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute,School of Population and Public Health,University of British Columbia,craig.mitton@ubc.ca.
Rahat QureshiDivision of Women & Child Health,Aga Khan University.
Stirling BryanCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation,Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute,School of Population and Public Health,University of British Columbia.
Laura A MageeMolecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute,St George's,University of London,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
Peter von DadelszenMolecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute,St George's,University of London,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaDivision of Women & Child Health,Aga Khan University,Program for Global Pediatric Research,Hospital For Sick Children,Toronto.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding cost-drivers and estimating societal costs are important challenges for economic evaluation of health technologies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study assessed community experiences of health resource usage and perceived cost-drivers from a societal perspective to inform the design of an economic model for the Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) trials.

methodsQualitative research was undertaken alongside the CLIP trial in two districts of Sindh province, Pakistan. Nine focus groups were conducted with a wide range of stakeholders, including pregnant women, mothers-in-law, husbands, fathers-in-law, healthcare providers at community and health facility-levels, and health decision/policy makers at district-level. The societal perspective included out-of-pocket (OOP), health system, and program implementation costs related to CLIP. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo software.

resultsMost pregnant women and male decision makers reported a large burden of OOP costs for in- and out-patient care, informal care from traditional healers, self-medication, childbirth, newborn care, transport to health facility, and missed wages by caretakers. Many healthcare providers identified health system costs associated with human resources for hypertension risk assessment, transport, and communication about patient referrals. Health decision/policy makers recognized program implementation costs (such as the mobile health infrastructure, staff training, and monitoring/supervision) as major investments for the health system.

conclusionsOur investigation of care-seeking practices revealed financial implications for families of pregnant women, and program implementation costs for the health system. The societal perspective provided comprehensive knowledge of cost drivers to guide an economic appraisal of the CLIP trial in Sindh, Pakistan.

Indexed as

Technology Assessment, BiomedicalFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMalePakistanPatient Acceptance of Health CarePre-EclampsiaPregnancyQualitative Researchand child health (MNCH)Cost driversEconomic modelHealth technology assessmentLow- and middle-income-countries (LMICs)Maternalnewborn

Identifiers

PMID28587686
PMCPMC5934709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.