Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28587666›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2017

Protocol for a systematic review of the efficacy of fat grafting and platelet-rich plasma for wound healing.

Oliver J Smith, Muholan Kanapathy, Ankur Khajuria, Max Prokopenko, Nadine Hachach-Haram, Haroon Mann, Ash Mosahebi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver J SmithRoyal Free Hospital Wound Healing Group, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Muholan KanapathyRoyal Free Hospital Wound Healing Group, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. muholan.kanapathy.13@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5311-8833
Ankur KhajuriaAcademic Surgery Foundation Programme, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Max ProkopenkoRoyal Free Hospital Wound Healing Group, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Nadine Hachach-HaramRoyal Free Hospital Wound Healing Group, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Haroon MannDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Ash MosahebiRoyal Free Hospital Wound Healing Group, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
The Royal Free Hospital · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of fat grafting as a reconstructive surgical option is becoming much more common. Adipose-derived stem cells found in fat grafts are believed to facilitate wound healing via differentiation into fibroblasts and keratinocytes and the release of pro-healing growth factors. Several small studies have shown a positive effect of fat grafting in healing of wounds of a variety of aetiologies. When fat is combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), there may be enhanced healing effects. This may be due to the pro-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory effects of PRP. We aim to synthesise the current evidence on combination fat grafting and PRP for wound healing to establish the efficacy of this technique. METHODS/

designWe will conduct a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Science Citation Index, and Google Scholar databases (up to July 2017) to identify studies on fat grafting and PRP for wound healing. All primary studies and systematic reviews of these studies will be included, except case reports and case series with fewer than three patients, to evaluate the outcome of fat grafting and PRP on wound healing either on its own or when compared to other studies. Primary outcome measures are expected to be the proportion of total wounds healed at 12 weeks and the average wound healing time (time for 100% re-epithelialisation). Expected secondary outcome measures are the proportion of wounds achieving 50% wound healing, the type of wound benefitting most from fat grafting, economic evaluation, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. Subgroup analysis will be performed for the proportions of wounds healed based on wound aetiology. DISCUSSION: This review will provide robust evidence of the efficacy of fat grafting and PRP for wound healing. This is an emerging technique, and this review is expected to guide clinical practice and ongoing research aimed at improving wound care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016049881.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich PlasmaWound HealingEvidence-Based PracticeHumansPlastic Surgery ProceduresRe-EpithelializationSystematic Reviews as TopicFat graftingLipofillingPlatelet rich plasmaSystematic reviewWound healing

Identifiers

PMID28587666
PMCPMC5461711
OpenAlexW2622925339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.