Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28587665›Full record

Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2017

Hospitalization for community-acquired febrile urinary tract infection: validation and impact assessment of a clinical prediction rule.

Janneke E Stalenhoef, Willize E van der Starre, Albert M Vollaard, Ewout W Steyerberg, Nathalie M Delfos, Eliane M S Leyten, Ted Koster, Hans C Ablij, Jan W Van't Wout, Jaap T van Dissel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Laying the digital and analytical foundations for Canada's future health care system.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Janneke E StalenhoefDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, C5-P, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. J.E.Stalenhoef@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-3045
Willize E van der StarreDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, C5-P, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Albert M VollaardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, C5-P, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nathalie M DelfosDept of Internal Medicine, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
Eliane M S LeytenDept of Internal Medicine, MCH-Bronovo, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Ted KosterDept of Internal Medicine, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands.
Hans C AblijDept of Internal Medicine, Alrijne Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jan W Van't WoutDept of Internal Medicine, MCH-Bronovo, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Jaap T van DisselDept of Internal Medicine, MCH-Bronovo, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Cees van NieuwkoopDept of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Bronovo Hospital · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLAlrijne Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLGroene Hart Ziekenhuis · NLHaga Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of severity assessment tools to identify adults presenting with febrile urinary tract infection (FUTI) at risk for complicated outcome and guide admission policy. We aimed to validate the Prediction Rule for Admission policy in Complicated urinary Tract InfeCtion LEiden (PRACTICE), a modified form of the pneumonia severity index, and to subsequentially assess its use in clinical practice.

methodsA prospective observational multicenter study for model validation (2004-2009), followed by a multicenter controlled clinical trial with stepped wedge cluster-randomization for impact assessment (2010-2014), with a follow up of 3 months. Paricipants were 1157 consecutive patients with a presumptive diagnosis of acute febrile UTI (787 in validation cohort and 370 in the randomized trial), enrolled at emergency departments of 7 hospitals and 35 primary care centers in the Netherlands. The clinical prediction rule contained 12 predictors of complicated course. In the randomized trial the PRACTICE included guidance on hospitalization for high risk (>100 points) and home discharge for low risk patients (<75 points), in the control period the standard policy regarding hospital admission was applied. Main outcomes were effectiveness of the clinical prediction rule, as measured by primary hospital admission rate, and its safety, as measured by the rate of low-risk patients who needed to be hospitalized for FUTI after initial home-based treatment, and 30-day mortality.

resultsA total of 370 patients were included in the randomized trial, 237 in the control period and 133 in the intervention period. Use of PRACTICE significantly reduced the primary hospitalization rate (from 219/237, 92%, in the control group to 96/133, 72%, in the intervention group, p < 0.01). The secondary hospital admission rate after initial outpatient treatment was 6% in control patients and 27% in intervention patients (1/17 and 10/37; p < 0.001).

conclusionsAlthough the proposed PRACTICE prediction rule is associated with a lower number of hospital admissions of patients presenting to the ED with presumptive febrile urinary tract infection, futher improvement is necessary to reduce the occurrence of secondary hospital admissions.

trial registrationNTR4480 http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4480 , registered retrospectively 25 mrt 2014 (during enrollment of subjects).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareAnti-Infective AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDecision Support TechniquesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFeverFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Infective AgentsCommunity-acquired febrile urinary tract infectionHospitalizationPrediction toolSeverity assessment

Identifiers

PMID28587665
PMCPMC5461732
OpenAlexW2624523499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.