Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28587616›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

A double-blind randomised controlled investigation into the efficacy of Mirococept (APT070) for preventing ischaemia reperfusion injury in the kidney allograft (EMPIRIKAL): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Theodoros Kassimatis, Anass Qasem, Abdel Douiri, Elizabeth G Ryan, Irene Rebollo-Mesa, Laura L Nichols, Roseanna Greenlaw, Jonathon Olsburgh, Richard A Smith, Steven H Sacks and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Complement activation in kidney transplantation.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Complement Inhibition in Kidney Transplantation: Where Are We Now?BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Theodoros KassimatisMRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Anass QasemMRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Abdel DouiriDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Elizabeth G RyanBiostatistics and Health Informatics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Irene Rebollo-MesaMRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Laura L NicholsMRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Roseanna GreenlawMRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Jonathon OlsburghMRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Richard A SmithMRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Steven H SacksMRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Martin DrageMRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK. Martin.Drage@gstt.nhs.uk.
King's College London · GBGuy's Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600892Medical Research Council G1001197Medical Research Council MR/J006742/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is traditionally defined as the requirement for dialysis during the first week after transplantation. DGF is a common complication of renal transplantation, and it negatively affects short- and long-term graft outcomes. Ischaemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is a prime contributor to the development of DGF. It is well established that complement system activation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of IRI. Mirococept is a highly effective complement inhibitor that can be administered ex vivo to the donor kidney just before transplantation. Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that Mirococept inhibits inflammatory responses that follow IRI. The EMPIRIKAL trial (REC 12/LO/1334) aims to evaluate the efficacy of Mirococept in reducing the incidence of DGF in cadaveric renal transplantation. METHODS/

designEMPIRIKAL is a multicentre double-blind randomised case-control trial designed to test the superiority of Mirococept in the prevention of DGF in cadaveric renal allografts, as compared to standard cold perfusion fluid (Soltran®). Patients will be randomised to Mirococept or placebo (Pbo) and will be enrolled in cohorts of N = 80 with a maximum number of 7 cohorts. The first cohort will be randomised to 10 mg of Mirococept or Pbo. After the completion of each cohort, an interim analysis will be carried out in order to evaluate the dose allocation for the next cohort (possible doses: 5-25 mg). Immunosuppression therapy, antibiotic and antiviral prophylaxis will be administered as per local centre protocols. The enrolment will take approximately 24 months, and patients will be followed for 12 months. The primary endpoint is DGF, defined as the requirement for dialysis during the first week after transplantation. Secondary endpoints include duration of DGF, functional DGF, renal function at 12 months, acute rejection episodes at 6 and 12 months, primary non-function and time of hospital stay on first admission and in the first year following transplant. Safety evaluation will include the monitoring of laboratory data and the recording of all adverse events. DISCUSSION: The EMPIRIKAL trial is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of an ex vivo administered complement inhibitor (Mirococept) in preventing DGF in cadaveric human renal transplantation. Mirococept has a unique 'cytotopic' property that permits its retention in the organ microvasculature.

trial registrationISRCTN registry, ISRCTN49958194 . Registered on 3 August 2012.

Indexed as

AllograftsClinical ProtocolsComplement Inactivating AgentsDelayed Graft FunctionDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleHumansKidney TransplantationPeptide FragmentsReceptors, Complement 3bReperfusion InjuryResearch DesignTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomComplement Inactivating AgentsPeptide FragmentsReceptors, Complement 3bComplement inhibitorDelayed graft functionIschaemia reperfusion injuryKidney transplantationMirococept

Identifiers

PMID28587616
PMCPMC5461672
OpenAlexW2624152115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.