ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2017
Treatment of patients with aortic disease during pregnancy and after delivery.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes and risk factors for cardiac surgery during pregnancy: a 13-year, two-centre, retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Ruptured Aortic Aneurysm in Pregnancy, Anesthetic Management of Endovascular Procedure.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Anesthetic management for cesarean section in two parturient with ascending aortic aneurysm: a case-based discussion.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
- TEVAR for acute type B aortic dissection in pregnant women (35 weeks gestation) with Takayasu's arteritis after cesarean section: a rare case report and literature review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Successful emergency management for aortic arch rupture in pregnancy at first trimesters: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to review treatment of patients with aortic disease during pregnancy and after delivery in Beijing Anzhen Hospital. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using data from 12 patients with aortic disease during pregnancy and after delivery in our institution from May 2005 to December 2014. Patients were provided different treatments based on the type of aortic disease and clinical characteristics. Results The mean age was 29.83 ± 4.17 years, mean height was 171.7 ± 8.22 cm, mean weight was 68.55 ± 10.62 kg, and mean body mass index was 23.18 ± 2.93 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.