ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017
Clinical application of the Innovance D-dimer assay in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary thromboembolism.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting 7-day unplanned readmission in elderly patients with coronary heart disease using machine learning.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Analysis of COVID-19 severity from the perspective of coagulation index using evolutionary machine learning with enhanced brain storm optimization.Journal of King Saud University. Computer and information sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (APTE) have a high short-term mortality rate. The current study aimed to investigate the use of D-dimer in the diagnosis of APTE in suspected APTE patients. All suspected APTE patients were classified into diagnosis or control groups according to the results of a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to evaluate the association between D-dimer values and APTE. Area under the curve (AUC) values and the Youden Index were used to determine D-dimer cut-off levels for the prediction of APTE. The data of 112 suspected APTE patients (54.8% women; mean age, 70.5 years) were analyzed prospectively. There were no significant differences in age (74.5 vs. 73.5 years, P=0.538) or gender distribution (female ratio 56.5 vs. 53.0%, P=0.847) between the diagnosis and control groups. The incidence of symptoms including dyspnea (67.4 vs. 33.3%; P<0.01), chest distress (47.8 vs. 25.8%; P<0.05) and elevated D-dimer (8.49 vs. 0.97 mg/l; P<0.001) were significantly higher in patients with APTE compared with the control group. D-dimer values >3.32 mg/l fibrinogen equivalent units (FEU) were indicative of APTE and the Youden Index was 0.69. The maximum AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92), the sensitivity and specificity were 89.13 and 80.30%, respectively, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.53 and 0.14, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 75.90 and 91.40%, respectively. A D-dimer value <0.60 mg/l FEU was the optimal threshold for excluding APTE diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 28.79%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.40 and 0.00, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 49.50 and 100.00%, respectively. Thus, D-dimer levels, combined with clinical assessment, yield high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing APTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.