Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28587298›Full record

ArticleViruses2017

Serotype-Specific Killing of Large Cell Carcinoma Cells by Reovirus.

Emily J Simon, Morgan A Howells, Johnasha D Stuart, Karl W Boehme

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cell Killing by Reovirus: Mechanisms and Consequences.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of virology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily J SimonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology and Center for Microbial Pathogenesis and Host Inflammatory Response, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. esimon@uams.edu.
Morgan A HowellsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology and Center for Microbial Pathogenesis and Host Inflammatory Response, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. mahowells@uams.edu.
Johnasha D StuartDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology and Center for Microbial Pathogenesis and Host Inflammatory Response, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. jdstuart@uams.edu.
Karl W BoehmeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology and Center for Microbial Pathogenesis and Host Inflammatory Response, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. kwboehme@uams.edu.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Zosuquidar trihydrochloride for acute myeloid leukemia &refractory anemiaM01RR000080 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND · PI DEARBORN, DORR GELLATLY · 1985 to 2007
$22.2M
Study of the Cell-specific Inflammasome Responses During Defense Against Gram-negative BacteriaP20GM103625 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SMELTZER, MARK S · 2012 to 2021
$21.5M
The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Initiative for Maximizing Student Development ProgramR25GM083247 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI MCGEHEE, ROBERT E, THOMAS, BILLY R · 2009 to 2023
$5.4M
Mechanisms of Reovirus Bloodstream DisseminationR01AI118801 · NIAID · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BOEHME, KARL W · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Mechanisms of Reovirus Bloodstream DisseminationK22AI094079 · NIAID · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BOEHME, KARL W · 2012 to 2013
$268k
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000080NIAID NIH HHS K22 AI094079NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118801NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103625NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM083247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reovirus is under development as a therapeutic for numerous types of cancer. In contrast to other oncolytic viruses, the safety and efficacy of reovirus have not been improved through genetic manipulation. Here, we tested the oncolytic capacity of recombinant strains (rs) of prototype reovirus laboratory strains T1L and T3D (rsT1L and rsT3D, respectively) in a panel of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. We found that rsT1L was markedly more cytolytic than rsT3D in the large cell carcinoma cell lines tested, whereas killing of adenocarcinoma cell lines was comparable between rsT1L and rsT3D. Importantly, non-recombinant T1L and T3D phenocopied the kinetics and magnitude of cell death induced by recombinant strains. We identified gene segments L2, L3, and M1 as viral determinants of strain-specific differences cell killing of the large cell carcinoma cell lines. Together, these results indicate that recombinant reoviruses recapitulate the cell killing properties of non-recombinant, tissue culture-passaged strains. These studies provide a baseline for the use of reverse genetics with the specific objective of engineering more effective reovirus oncolytics. This work raises the possibility that type 1 reoviruses may have the capacity to serve as more effective oncolytics than type 3 reoviruses in some tumor types.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationCarcinoma, Large CellCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalHumansOncolytic VirusesReoviridaeSerogrouplung canceroncolysisreovirusreverse genetics

Identifiers

PMID28587298
PMCPMC5490817
OpenAlexW2622760529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.