Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28587211›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2017

Changes in Microbial (Bacteria and Archaea) Plankton Community Structure after Artificial Dispersal in Grazer-Free Microcosms.

Hera Karayanni, Alexandra Meziti, Sofie Spatharis, Savvas Genitsaris, Claude Courties, Konstantinos A Kormas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hera KarayanniDepartment of Biological Applications and Technology, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece. hkaray@cc.uoi.gr.
Alexandra MezitiDepartment of Biological Applications and Technology, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece. ameziti@gmail.com.
Sofie SpatharisUniversity of Glasgow, BAHCM Institute and School of Life Sciences, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK. Sofie.Spatharis@glasgow.ac.uk.
Savvas GenitsarisLaboratoire d'Océanologie et Géosciences (LOG), UMR CNRS 8187, Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale (ULCO), 32 av. Foch, 62930 Wimereux, France. savvas.genitsaris@yahoo.gr.
Claude CourtiesSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMS2348, Laboratoire d'Océanographie Microbienne, Observatoire Océanologique, 66650 Banyuls-sur-mer, France. claude.courties@orange.fr.
Konstantinos A KormasDepartment of Ichthyology & Aquatic Environment, University of Thessaly, 383 46 Volos, Greece. kkormas@uth.gr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes are considered to have a global distribution due to their high dispersal capabilities. However, our knowledge of the way geographically distant microbial communities assemble after dispersal in a new environment is limited. In this study, we examined whether communities would converge because similar taxa would be selected under the same environmental conditions, or would diverge because of initial community composition, after artificial dispersal. To this aim, a microcosm experiment was performed, in which the temporal changes in the composition and diversity of different prokaryoplankton assemblages from three distant geographic coastal areas (Banyuls-sur-Mer in northwest Mediterranean Sea, Pagasitikos Gulf in northeast Mediterranean and Woods Hole, MA, USA in the northwest Atlantic), were studied. Diversity was investigated using amplicon pyrosequencing of the V1-V3 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA. The three assemblages were grown separately in particle free and autoclaved Banyuls-sur-mer seawater at 18 °C in the dark. We found that the variability of prokaryoplankton community diversity (expressed as richness, evenness and dominance) as well as the composition were driven by patterns observed in Bacteria. Regarding community composition, similarities were found between treatments at family level. However, at the OTU level microbial communities from the three different original locations diverge rather than converge during incubation. It is suggested that slight differences in the composition of the initial prokaryoplankton communities, resulted in separate clusters the following days even when growth took place under identical abiotic conditions.

Indexed as

16S rRNAbiogeographycommunitydispersiondiversitymicrobial assemblagemicrocosmsmixingpyrosequencing

Identifiers

PMID28587211
PMCPMC5488102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.